Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 F.3d 371

Docket No. 95-7407.

Brinkley v. Smith

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Jan. 18, 1996. Decided: Feb. 5, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-02-05

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Coleman v. Peyton · Robert S. Coleman, Jr. v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-02-05

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charlie Brinkley, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Appellant alleged physical mutilation and deprivation of personal property. Because Appellant may be able to particularize his complaint to state a non-frivolous claim, see Coleman v. Peyton, 340 F.2d 603, 604 (4th Cir.1965), we modify the district court's order to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice and affirm that disposition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

/76/f3d/371 · .json · Public domain