Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 F.3d 372

Docket No. 95-7650.

Ferrell v. Amonette

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996 Decided Jan. 25, 1996

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-01-25

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2006

1 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Nestor G. Gonzales v. Ellis B. Wright

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-01-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-94-R)

Ralph Lewis Ferrell, Appellant Pro Se.

Eleanor Andrews Lasky, Powell M. Leitch, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ferrell v. Amonette, No. CA-95-94-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 19, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for copies of his medical records. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/76/f3d/372 · .json · Public domain