Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 F.3d 372

Docket No. 95-6657.

Nestor G. Gonzales v. Ellis B. Wright

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Jan. 25, 1996. Submitted Jan. 9, 1996. Decided Jan. 25, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-01-25

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 1996 · most notably Sullivan v. Young Bros. (1996), Ferrell v. Amonette (1996)

27 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-01-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Nestor G. Gonzales, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before HALL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Gonzales v. Wright, No. CA-94-584-R (E.D.Va. Mar. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/76/f3d/372 · .json · Public domain