76 N.J.L. 576
Decided June 15, 1908
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1908-06-15
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinon is expressed in thé following memorandum: Pee Cueiam. This is a conviction for keeping a disorderly house. On the trial, the ground upon which the disorderly character of the house was put, was that it was a place wherein whoring was habitually permitted. The first assignment is based upon an exception to the refusal of the trial judge to quash the indictment.
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1971
4 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
The judgment is affirmed · Decided 1908-06-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the memorandum filed in the Supreme Court.
¶2For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Mjnturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 14.
¶3For reversal—None.