Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 U.S. 664

Herndon v. Howard

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 1, 1869

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1869-12

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Stay/motion granted · 9–0 · Decided 1869-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1997

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions

5018691870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Where an appellant in this court becomes bankrupt after his appeal taken, his assignee in bankruptcy upon the production of the deed of assignment of the register in bankruptcy, duly certified by the clerk of the proper court, may, on motion, be substituted as appellant in the case.

¶2In this case Herndon had taken an appeal from the Circuit Court for the Western District of Texas; and after doing so had become bankrupt. His assignee in bankruptcy — one Masterson — now moved to be admitted as a party appellant in the cause with the original appellant, Herndon.

¶3His motion was supported by the production of the deed of assignment of the register in bankruptcy of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas, in the matter of his bankruptcy to Masterson, duly attested by the clerk of the court. The motion was founded upon the foui’teenth section of the Bankrupt Law, which provides that the assignee in bankruptcy may prosecute and defend in his own name all suits at law and in equity pending at the time of the adjudication of bankruptcy, in which the bankrupt is a party, in the same manner and with the like effect as they might have been prosecuted or defended by the bankrupt, and which makes a copy of the register’s assignment, duly certified by the clerk of the proper court, conclusive evidence of the right of the assignee to sue.

¶4*665The CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5delivered the opinion of the court.

¶6The section of the Bankrupt Law relied on, we think, governs the' present case. It seems to require that Master-son, the assignee, be substituted as appellant for Herndon, the bankrupt, who may be said to be civiliter mortuus, precisely as an executor or administrator would be made party instead of an appellant actually deceased; and an order will be

¶7Made accordingly.

/76/us/664 · .json · Public domain