760 F. Supp. 2d 607 - Edwards v. Murphy-Brown, L.L.C.’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1658 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If one act in a continuous history of discriminatory conduct falls within the charge filing period, then acts that are plausibly or sufficiently related to that act which fall outside the filing period may be considered for purposes of liability even though these acts cannot serve as the basis for an EEOC charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“make an earlier discrete discriminatory action, for which time has expired, timely once again by 'bootstrapping' it to a timely charge, even if both incidents are related”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mustafa v. Iancu“[A]n employee challenging an employment practice ... in Virginia has 300 days from the last date of alleged discrimination to file a charge with the EEOC.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.