Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

762 So. 2d 1004

McCray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-07-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2008

2 state decisions

Relies on 761 So. 2d 324 - Thompson v. State · 745 So. 2d 519 - Grant v. State · Pollock v. Couffer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-07-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial court sentenced appellant as a habitual felony offender, violent career criminal, and prison releasee reoffender. We remand for re-sentencing and instruct the trial court to sentence appellant under only one sentencing provision. Mendez v. State, 761 So.2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Adams v. State, 750 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

¶2We recognize that this decision conflicts with those of other districts, and, thus, certify conflict with Grant v. State, 745 So.2d 519 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) rev. granted, 761 So.2d 329 (Fla.2000); Smith v. State, 754 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Alfonso v. State, 761 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

¶3REVERSED and REMANDED.

FARMER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
/762/so2d/1004 · .json · Public domain