Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

763 F.2d 1098

Docket No. 83-2343, 84-1857.

Lynch v. Rank

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submitted June 12, 1984.

Decided June 20, 1985.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1985-06-20

2 counsel of record

Relies on Lynch v. Rank · Bordallo v. Reyes

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-06-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2017

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

901985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Evelyn R. Frank, Legal Aid Society of Alameda County, Oakland, Cal., Terry B. Friedman, Bet Tzedek Legal Services, Gil Deford, Nat. Senior Citizens Law Cntr., Byron Gross, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles, and Daniel Brzovic, Bet Tzedek Legal Services, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants, cross-appellees.

¶2Christopher Stoll, Asst. U.S. Atty., Cade Morrow, Asst. Regional Atty., Dept, of Health & Human Services, Catherine M. Van Aken, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

¶3Before WALLACE, FLETCHER and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER

¶5The petition for rehearing is granted. The second-to-last paragraph of our opinion in this case, 747 F.2d 528, 536 (beginning “The statute itself ... ”) is deleted. In all other respects, the opinion is reaffirmed. The mandate shall now issue in due course.

/763/f2d/1098 · .json · Public domain