Grubbs v. State

¶1We affirm the revocation of the appellant’s probation, as there was sufficient evidence to support the revocation in accordance with the court’s oral pronouncement. However, because it does not appear that a written revocation order was entered the case is remanded for entry of a written order consistent with the oral pronouncement. See Walker v. State, 686 *1234So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Simonetta v. State, 685 So.2d 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).