McDuff v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
5
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
26 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · Commonwealth v. England · Commonwealth v. Kohl · 404 So. 2d 929 - State v. Bickham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he tragic fact that a fatality arises out of a motor vehicle accident is in no way, standing alone, an indicator that alcohol or drugs were involved”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. STEWART v. STATE · STEWART v. STATE“the drawing of the two (2) tubes of . . . blood, done specifically at the request of law enforcement, was improper because this was done without probable cause, a warrant or consent, and was not incident to a lawful arrest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure applies when an intrusion into the bodysuch as a blood testis undertaken without a warrant, absent an emergency situation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.