Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 F.2d 1129 - McKinney v. Dole

McKinney v. Dole’s Empirical Analysis

765 F.2d 1129 · 1985

Citation profile

167
cited by 167 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

60 federal appellate · 46 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 167 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018 · most notably Andrews v. City of Philadelphia (1990), Lipsett v. University of Puerto Rico (1988)

60 federal appellate · 46 district · 18 state decisions — followed in 10 states

10501985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 633A (§ 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Griggs v. Duke Power Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 167 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any harassment or other unequal treatment of an employee or group of employees that would not occur but for the sex of the employee or employees may, if sufficiently patterned or pervasive, comprise an illegal condition of employment under Title VII”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'(1) an employee participates in a statutorily protected activity, [i.e., the use of health insurance benefits] (2) an adverse employment action is taken against him or her, and (3) a causal connection existed between the two.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[u]nwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.