Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

765 So. 2d 94

Vanderberg v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-05-15

Relies on Bandy v. Sheffield · Brown v. State

Decided 2000-05-15

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial court should not have dismissed appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus without specifying which documents appellant failed to supply in his previous filings under section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (1997). See Bandy v. Sheffield, 751 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Gosman v. Moore, 745 So.2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

¶2REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
/765/so2d/94 · .json · Public domain