766 So. 2d 206 - Spence v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Armstrong v. State · 729 So. 2d 364 - James v. State · 675 So. 2d 94 - Coon v. State · Eastland v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Counsel will be appointed to represent an indigent probationer upon request: "(1) If the probationer makes a colorable claim that the probationer has not committed the alleged violation of the conditions or regulations of probation or the instructions issued by the probation officer; or "(2) Even when the violation is a matter of public record or is uncontested, if there are substantial reasons that justify or mitigate the violation and that may make revocation inappropriate, and the reasons are complex or otherwise difficult to develop or present."”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jenkins v. State · Gibbons v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.