Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 767 F.3d 694 - Muhammad v. Caterpillar, Inc.

Muhammad v. Caterpillar, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

767 F.3d 694 · 2014

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Tomanovich v. City of Indianapolis · Montgomery v. American Airlines, Inc. · Cerutti v. BASF Corp. · Sylvester v. SOS Children's Villages Illinois, Inc. · Durkin v. City of Chicago

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Title VII requires only that employers take action reasonably calculated to stop unlawful harassment; that requirement does not necessarily include disciplining the employees responsible for past conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.