Esteban v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396D (§ 1905 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Soberon v. United States · Harris v. McRae
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“once the State voluntarily elects to provide wheelchairs to eligible Medicaid re cipients, it must provide wheelchairs that are sufficient in amount, duration and scope to achieve their purpose. Providing manual wheelchairs to eligible Medicaid recipients with severe mobility-impairments is not sufficient to achieve the State’s purpose. [T]he State’s limitation of coverage for the parties in this action seeking customized or motorized wheelchairs with severe mobility impairments is not sufficient in amount, duration and scope to achieve their purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Medicaid Act, Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396 , is a cooperative federal-state program designed to allow states to receive matching funds from the federal government to finance necessary services to qualified low-income individuals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.