77 N.J. Eq. 589
Decided November 14, 1910
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1910-11-14
<p>On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Walker, whose opinion is reported in 75 N. J. Eq. (5 Buch.) 462.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1910-11-14
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 1968
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1So much of the decree as is involved in this appeal will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Walker in the court below.
¶2For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parke?, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Dill, Congdon — 13.
¶3For reversal — None.