Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

771 A.2d 1260

Commonwealth v. McEnany

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 2001

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2001-05-22

Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably 2002 Pa. Super. 327 - Lytle v. CitiFinancial Services, Inc. (2002), Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (2008)

1 district · 96 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-05-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ZAPPALA, Justice,

¶1dissenting.

¶2I dissent and would address the merits of the issue we granted allowance of appeal to review. With the use of portable electronic devices capable of storing information becoming increasingly common, the proper application of principles of search and seizure law to such devices and their components is an issue of substantial importance. Having already deferred review of the order denying suppression once in this case, I believe the Court errs in not reaching the merits again. To my mind it *1261is the dismissal of the appeal that is improvident, not its grant.

/771/a2d/1260 · .json · Public domain