State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · United States v. Goldberg · State v. Ramey · State v. Carruthers · Fischetti v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the [district] court must advise the defendant of the following: (a) nature of the charges; (b) all offenses included within the charges; (c) range of allowable punishments; ... and (f) all other facts essential to a broad understanding of the consequences of the waiver of the right to counsel, including the advantages and disadvantages of the decision to waive counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rhoads“may be relinquished in three ways: (1) waiver, (2) waiver by conduct, and (3) forfeiture.” Jones, 772 N.W.2d at 504 . Waiver and waiver by conduct are not at issue here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Krause“The same colloquy required for affirmative waivers must also be given before a defendant can be said to have waived his right to counsel by conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Osbey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.