People v. Gore’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2015
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3651
Relies on People v. Ledford · People v. Deadmond · 44 Colo. App. 270 - People v. Peretsky · State v. Santos · People v. Ray
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[flor good cause shown and after notice to the defendant, the district attorney, and the probation officer, and after a hearing if the defendant or the district attorney requests it, ... reduce or increase the term of probation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the defendant fails to pay the restitution, he shall be returned to the sentencing court which, upon proof of failure to pay, may: (a) Modify the amount of the restitution; (b) Extend the period of probation; (c) Order the defendant committed to jail with work release privileges; or '(d) Revoke probation and impose the sentence otherwise required by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Itlhe probation statute does not specify when a trial court's authority over a probationer terminates,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Jenkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.