Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 776 P.2d 929 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2005
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2005

8 state decisions

50198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Copeland · State v. Tillman · State v. Eldredge · State v. Crank · State v. Gerrard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant cannot lead the court into error by failing to object and then later, when he is displeased with the verdict, profit by his actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “procedurally unjustified and viewed with disfavor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.