Griffiths v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 763 So. 2d 1002 - Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar · 745 So. 2d 469 - State v. Rajaee · Johnson v. State · 775 So. 2d 321 - Elharda v. State · St. Preux v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I agree with Judge Levy's dissent in [ Elharda, Rajaee ] and the statement in [ Johnson ], all to the effect that, `[i]f the trial court had warned him of the risk of deportation when he believed he was a United States citizen, there is no reason to think that the warning would have altered his decision. Any prejudice he would have sustained in that circumstance would relate to his own lack of knowledge about his own citizenship, and not to a failure of the trial court to give him correct legal information.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.