Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 778 F.2d 216 - Whitaker v. Carney

Whitaker v. Carney’s Empirical Analysis

778 F.2d 216 · 1985

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2015

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

1001985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1443 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer · Georgia v. Rachel · City of Greenwood v. Peacock · Johnson v. Mississippi · Rachel v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No explicit requirements respecting any specific preventive measures or grievance procedures which might be consistent with the duties outlined in the statute are anywhere to be found in Title VII itself. Nor are the relevant EEOC regulations more helpful.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise, except that an order remanding a case ... removed pursuant to section 1443 of this title shall be reviewable by appeal or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.