Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

780 A.2d 603

Commonwealth v. Stansell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 2001

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2001-08-21

Relies on Carter v. Beckerman · Commonwealth v. Hickox

Decided 2001-08-21

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM

¶2AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2001, it is ORDERED as follows:

¶3Petitioner was represented by appointed counsel in his appeal to the Superior Court, which resulted in affirmance of the judgment of sentence. Thereafter, petitioner filed a pro se petition for allowance of appeal.

¶4Pa. R.Crim.P. 122(C)(3), formerly Pa. R.Crim.P. 316(e)(iii), requires that: “Where counsel has been assigned, such assignment shall be effective until final judgment, including any proceedings upon direct appeal.”

¶5Petitioner’s counsel, appointed in connection with his appeal to the Superior Court, is directed to proceed in accordance with the Rule. Commonwealth v. Hickox, 433 Pa. 144, 249 A.2d 777 (1969).

/780/a2d/603 · .json · Public domain