Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 SO2D 237 - Blythe v. James Lock & Co.

Blythe v. James Lock & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 520 So. 2d 582 - King v. State · Myers v. State · 728 So. 2d 192 - Davis v. State · 512 So. 2d 266 - Norflor Const. Corp. v. City of Gainesville · 558 So. 2d 519 - Barton-Malow Co. v. Gorman Co. of Ocala, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Good cause' has repeatedly been defined as requiring two prongs: [1] some contact with the opposing party and [2] some form of excusable conduct or occurrence which arose other than through negligence or inattention to the pleading deadline.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.