Bryant v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 674 So. 2d 889 - Leichtman v. Singletary · 699 So. 2d 849 - Calloway v. State · 664 So. 2d 31 - Patterson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We agree with the trial court that Bryant is collaterally attacking his judgment and sentence and that the proper method to do so was to file a motion pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Richardson v. State“[A] petition for habeas corpus cannot be used to circumvent the two-year period for filing motions for post-conviction relief”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.