Ivy v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
781 F.3d 250 · 2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12134 (§ 204 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Christensen v. Harris County · Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“certain activities may be at least indirectly affected by both titles”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he State is not accountable for discrimination in the employment or other practices of XYZ company [an entity which the State licenses], if those practices are not the result of requirements or policies established by the State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.