Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 786 F.3d 559 - Castro v. DeVry University, Inc.

Castro v. DeVry University, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

786 F.3d 559 · 2015

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Clark County School District v. Breeden · 133 S. Ct. 2517 - University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar · Troupe v. May Department Stores Co. · Shager v. Upjohn Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To show pretext, an employee must present evidence suggesting that the employer is dissembling. The question is not whether the employer’s stated reason was inaccurate or unfair, but whether the employer honestly believed the reason it has offered to explain the discharge. To meet this burden, the employee must identify such weaknesses, implausibilities, inconsistencies, or com tradictions in the employer’s proffered reason that a reasonable person could find [it] unworthy of credence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “to be probative of discrimination, isolated comments must be contemporaneous with the employment decision or causally related to the decision making process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “As a general rule, a reasonable trier of fact can infer pretext from an employer's shifting or inconsistent explanations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.