Newberry v. Silverman’s Empirical Analysis
789 F.3d 636 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc. · Smith v. Howard Johnson Co. · Morgan v. Biro Manufacturing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A complaint must contain a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. ... A claim is facially plausible when the pleaded factual content allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged. ... [T]he court need not accept as true allegations that are con-clusory or require unwarranted inferences based on the alleged facts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.