State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Crookston v. Fire Insurance Exchange (1991), Klopp v. Wackenhut Corp. (1992)
51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Verde · State v. Copeland · State v. Tillman · State v. Eldredge · State v. Van Matre
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court loses all jurisdiction over persons sentenced to prison.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Vaughn · State v. Anderson“the right to a fair trial, in violation of Article I, section 12 of the Utah Constitution and Article I, section 7 of the Utah Constitution.” He reasoned that the practice created "juries which are under-representative of the community at large, conviction prone, and are more likely to impose the death penalty.” The trial court denied the motion. On appeal, defendant expands this argument, contending that "Article I, sections 7, 9, 10, and 12 of the Utah Constitution do not support the current practice of using the same death qualified jury to decide both the guilt and penalty phases of a capital trial.” Because he failed to raise the argument in the trial court that death qualification violated sections 9 and 10 of article I, he "cannot assert it as a basis of error on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Alvarez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.