790 A.2d 988
Decided January 31, 2002
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2002-01-31
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2003
2 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“I. Whether the [trial court and Superior Court] erred in failing to suppress certain communications obtained in violation of the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act. II. Whether the [trial court and Superior Court] erred in failing to suppress certain communications obtained in violation of the United States Constitution and/or the Pennsylvania Constitution.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Commonwealth v. Proetto
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-01-31
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1ORDER
¶2AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, but LIMITED to the following issues:
1. Whether the lower tribunals erred in failing to suppress certain communications obtained in violation of the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act.
2. Whether the lower tribunals erred in failing to suppress certain communications obtained in violation of the United States Constitution and/or the Pennsylvania Constitution.