Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 798 SW2D 8 - Bermen v. State

Bermen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2018

6 state decisions

40199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 337th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Albrecht v. State · Houston v. State · Humason v. State · Anderson v. State · United States v. Quezada

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity, and if it was the regular practice of that business activity to make the memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness, or by affidavit that complies with Rule 902(10), unless the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness. “Business” as used in this paragraph includes any and every kind of regular organized activity whether conducted for profit or not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “We are of the view that there is no point in having Texas rule 803(8)(B) if it can be bypassed by resort to Texas rule 803(6).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the subjective features of reports made in a[n] ... adversarial setting”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.