United States v. Binker’s Empirical Analysis
799 F.2d 695 · 1986
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952
Relies on Brown v. Ohio · Garrett v. United States · Jeffers v. United States · Kent v. Sanborn Cooperative Grain Co. · Indiana Employment Security Division v. Burney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the later prosecution rests on facts that the government could not have discovered earlier through due diligence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“theory would provide a ground of reversal....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.