Garrett v. Lujan’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 31 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 293 F. Supp. 2d 135 - Buggs v. Powell (2003), 937 F. Supp. 32 - Phillips v. Holladay Property Services, Inc. (1996)
2 federal appellate · 31 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by persons not involved in the employment decision making process are not material to a finding of discrimination unless those remarks are made to the decision-makers and have some impact on the selection process.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“between plaintiffs EEO activity and the adverse employment decision is too great [a length of time] to support an inference of reprisal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.