Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 F.3d 816

Docket No. 93-6137.

Charles M. Bernadou v. James N. Rollins, Warden H. E. Rogers, Classification Supervisor Marvin Robbins, Executive Director William Purnell, Major

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: August 25, 1993. Decided: October 18, 1993.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-10-18

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Brown-Brunson v. Hunter

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-10-18

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-1373-H)

Charles M. Bernadou, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Amy Kushner Kline, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Charles M. Bernadou appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bernadou v. Rollins, No. CA-91-1373-H (D. Md. Jan. 14, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Because there are no complex or substantial issues presented in this appeal, we deny Bernadou's motion for appointment of counsel

/8/f3d/816 · .json · Public domain