Smith v. American Can Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1956
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 101 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 151 (§ 1 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 251 (Employee Commuting Flexibility Act of 1996) · 29 U.S.C. § 252 · 41 U.S.C. § 35
Relies on Norton v. Larney · Ewell v. Daggs · Smith v. McCullough · National Carloading Corp. v. Phoenix-El Paso Express, Inc. · Hazzard v. Alexander
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.