Z’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 3321 · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Henry Prentiss & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“convictions for indecent fondling of two minors in the same room at the same time,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Szonyi v. Whitaker“so related in time and purpose as in reality to constitute”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Szonyi v. Whitaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.