8 Ky.
Volume 8 — Kentucky Reports
391 opinions
- 8 Ky. 1Heirs of Searcy v. Reardon (1816)
<p>A mere vol-rtewmSmft‘ t?favored as a purchaser for a valuable ^ithmit^no" tíce¡ he »lands ⅛ the attitude of and affected V ⅛⅛ fraud,</p> <p>On setting ⅛? salí'of' lands and or-«ieving possession tobe i n-chase - ½ should ac- • oimt for fhe^timeTe 100k sion, to be wducedfrom ¿mprovtt-</p>
- 8 Ky. 3Shannon v. Kinny (1817)
<p>Evidence ⅜ fce excluded be°caus<*e,of ^ irrelevancy, should cfear, °</p> <p>C rcumstan-cp.s f.-om •v!’.e.nc® ti,^e aumo"^feet material to should be!'-ft ⅛ them.</p> <p>^opTnit’s ófentry ru-cci not cor-v+rtc in 0⅜ person or be held under _ the theevvhoi80r time if t.Kv’re has been 2 ) \e*r$vn‘in‘er~ rviilcd ail--rst-te posse’sion, by or many sons, tinder one or more fule», it h su®CjeRt-</p>
- 8 Ky. 5Shannon v. Dickenson (1817)
<p>~ , , . , On an appeal from a judgment */ «⅛ Woodford circwit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 6Furguson v. White (1817)
<p>. A deed of £ifc mi4.^IR3' («-limitations need not. be .)V months ofíts date; if it i» recorded be^ty beenpossess-ed by »noc.-; ef ^ years, it is sufficient.</p> <p>Municipal regulation, will mot operate extra tewaionsm.</p> <p>If such a deed contain-servations* is recorded ⅛ ter the prop-Bos^wsedbv iuiother five years within ⅛¾ as to 'creditors and pur-chasersofthe ° er‘</p>
- 8 Ky. 6Rees v. Middleton (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a judg* merit of the Warren circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 8Buckner v. Trustees of Augusta (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Bradzen circuit court . </p>
- 8 Ky. 10Woodyard's heirs v. Threlkeld (1816)
<p>An order of the county, court direct-: i.npf tile fdier-. iff to aiinwii, ister the es* tale of R. W¿ does not au-? thorisc him’ to sell the c-state of H. W'.</p> <p>evidence cannot he admitted to vary the terna s of a record</p> <p>An heir can not maintain an action in his own name for a siavej without the assent of the exer- or ach min.strator,</p> <p>Neither can a specific ie gatee maintain such suit, without such assent.</p> <p>Note. — The circumstances of this case occurcd before the passage of the act of 1800, chapter 270, 2 Littel, pa. 374, vide post. Iron’s Exx. vs. Luckey.</p>
- 8 Ky. 13Keith v. Humphries (1817)
<p>fact which las been submitted to a jury in n cabe *Ablún the spheie Of' their j'iiis-diclior, can afterwards be examined ill equity. .</p> <p>Vide post — Carpenter vs. Oran & al. spring term, 1818, and Dewces vs. Richardson, fall term, 1818.</p>
- 8 Ky. 15Craig v. Scandret (1817)
<p>The people ot all towns to elect &h tnistces, un-fess such is restrained by positive statute.</p>
- 8 Ky. 15Keene v. Macy (1817)
<p>¡appeal from a judgment of ' the Franklin circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 16Lawless v. Jones (1817)
<p>A mista!» m the calls oí tfconectel hr the other caj'1’ thereof: «“"⅞* h’rs. «¿hied 569, Helm vs. Small; post, Swann vs Wilson. decisions, pa ⅛!™,’</p> <p>a claim fia-erediiswuich. hud been submitted to it jury & ⅛⅛'.. lowed, forms 110 T.fyn Fr wdbence: — Ante, kdi.h vs.^Humpin’s I’io. ’ ~ ° U</p> <p>A fact ad-rí¡Ue<1 a sb ’J*ewnby ⅛ defendant.</p>
- 8 Ky. 19Banton v. Hoomes' Exec'rs (1817)
<p> !On an appeal from a judgment of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 20Joyce v. Farquhar (1817)
<p>A delivery L-líicVon tbeiudrmcnt and lion under taken1 not complied with, ope-⅛⅛⅛”6Wr J ° ‘</p>
- 8 Ky. 22Callaghan v. Carr (1817)
<p>a^Si'decree or judgment agamst sev-jóhi’in of error; ride l ui. Ray, u' 7⅛ 14""' Cai-Lii. 7</p> <p>if an those t*d by tí¡e judgment or •heiHhe heir j!)usi’juin,uM-Jess the vhxsnhe sur-vivimj defts. irihecharge ^aiiist63 the fieirs of the dec. or the subjcct^mat-scen'd to them, they imist. join m *'*nt Cr"</p> <p>Ail ⅞-ho sa-e beuefaed ™writ of error.</p> <p>Tocrf£g several, there must error^vide Cro. Car 300* Hob.72, Style 174, Cartb. 447, which last cites 1st Salk. 89, S Mod 397,6th ¡¿p 161_ ‘ *</p> <p>Note. — This question came on again, fall term, 1818, on a motion to discharge a writ of error, Estills heirs, & al. vs. Clay, and was adjudged accordingly; but being a verbal opinion, is not reported.</p>
- 8 Ky. 23Keith v. Patton (1817)
<p>' A suit will not lie for failing to con vey land verbally sold, tho’ part of the payment lias been made.</p> <p>A partial pa;,-merit in property being made under such contract, trover and not as-sumpsit, is the appropriate remedy.</p>
- 8 Ky. 24Handley's Ex'r v. Fitzhugh (1817)
<p> On appeal from a decree of the Nelson circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 26Henderson v. Howard's Devisees (1817)
<p>SOyesrspoa-⅛ "¡Tva unsurveyed * entry,affords extent of the close.</p> <p>Á deposition. takenun-der the aclto ascertain the bou. .daries oí land, cannot be used &- gainst a person known io the party taking it, 'and living1 in the county where the land lies, unless he h*d notice.</p>
- 8 Ky. 28Hughes v. M'Gee (1817)
On a writ cf error to reverse a judgment of the Mercer circuit court. on the rendition of this opinion, filed a petition for a rehearing in these; words;— To the Honorable, the Judges of the Court of Appeals. ' The counsel of David and Molly M’Gce, defendants in error, at the suit of Joseph Hughes, would respectfully and most earnestly solicit your honors for a rehearing of said case; in which eventthev entertain a serious, and they trust, a well grounded hope, that they can…
- 8 Ky. 39Dickey v. Armstrong's devisees (1817)
<p>Ia ft .&.Bt estate to ser-ifUierMiTof“ entry is tol’d as tosome,aU'“ Arteras tenancy in common.</p> <p>In a joint demise by se-have’^ri^ht of entry; dr none can re-</p>
- 8 Ky. 41Morrison v. Furnham (1817)
<p>Mutual subs;surK »sthe payment; of money may (,mder . "f under the general issue</p>
- 8 Ky. 42White v. Ogden (1817)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse S judgment of the Shelby cir~ "mit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 43Brown v. M'Cleland (1817)
<p>On a ced-work.int’rest is not charg--on such co-venanitheju-⅛„; give or refuse inte-^uTbi the’ exercise J*IS* tj ^ wholly im-¿hackled by “N, l"ytr^ court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 43Tunstal v. Taylor (1817)
<p>On an appeal from a decree ■ of the Franklin circuit18 court</p>
- 8 Ky. 44Commonwealth v. Porter (1817)
<p>0» a writ of error to reverse an order of the Henry county court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 46Perry v. Head (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Franklin circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 48Ward v. Commonwealth (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Clarke cir~ cuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 48Anderson v. Bacon (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Franklin circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 52Dougherty v. Kercheval (1817)
<p> On a writ of error to rp-verse a judgment of the Mason circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 52Fletcher v. Andrews (1817)
<p> On a writ of error to re~ verse a judgment of ties Bath circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 54Rochester v. Trotter (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a judgr ment of the Mercer circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 54Jones v. Skiles (1817)
<p> On an appeal fiom ajudgmerA of the Bullit circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 55Adair v. Caldwell (1817)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Gray-son circuit coilrt. </p>
- 8 Ky. 55New v. Ewing (1817)
<p>An order establishing a road is de* fective unless it states on whose motion the view was granted, and ■ those summoned thro’ whose land the road passes.</p>
- 8 Ky. 56Cotton v. Hart (1817)
<p>n . , , Ob aft appeal from a merge of t!ie circmt courl-</p>
- 8 Ky. 58Reese v. Lawless (1817)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Warren circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 59Stewart v. Jackson (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of IVar-ren. </p>
- 8 Ky. 59Joiit v. Sampson (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Bath circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 60Essex v. Cary (1817)
<p>A petition cannot be maintain'd in court?eneral</p> <p>A statute creating' aju-risdictionun-commoniaw6 must be construed Ab tute, letter.!. 10 Rule,97th case, Ads.26, 2/^10 Rep! 75,</p>
- 8 Ky. 60Daniel v. Ellis (1817)
<p>To change l,’echaracter sionfromad-verse to amicable,somea^ty'obíiga-tory, must be j made, ac-the^lüí'of the plif a mere verbal agreement to over-hanging title will not ?,0P run" j^,0 0'f tations.</p> <p>. A posses-ofmeiand'io controversy, is possession interference6 _vi<le post, Uraxdale vs sPeeii-</p>
- 8 Ky. 62M'Gee v. Morgan (1817)
<p>Possession to iTpUf ⅛ ejectment, bust appear hostile2 *and continu’d un interuptediy tenrv^Uui tovv’s lessee vs. Myers— s Johns. S88‘</p>
- 8 Ky. 63Ficklin v. Clay (1817)
<p>in a suit on a bond’byUthe assignee of need not arer the escape of the</p> <p>t ^ g-ainst the jailor for re-fusmg to kEo verment is necessary, the jailor ⅛-assign only in ti»e event of escape.</p> <p>brought on prison bound bonds, it is the breachtn the words of the bond.</p>
- 8 Ky. 63Sebastian v. Thompkins (1817)
<p>⅜ declara t;0‘n onaspe’ cial ag-ree-raenj< m"st agreement in all its mate-t0Jf.°fee. ment and ⅛& performance ⅛⅛ Pla“* isnotenough, the allegata?*. Prabata myst vide 4 Bac ⅛ t;. tie pleas and pfoadhgs, j6 . J;(cites" Sanderson, 319)</p>
- 8 Ky. 64Breckenridge v. Beard (1817)
<p>ejectment "" cannot de-fond himself an outstMu? ing patent of equal date with thepitf so shews a privity be-twj'en outstanding patent. J</p>
- 8 Ky. 65Shanks v. Kennedy (1817)
<p>On an appeal from a decree o/jg the Lincoln circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 66Dillon v. Dudley (1817)
<p>A note payable on demand, does not bear interest till ⅜ demand io made.</p> <p>On reversing a decree in averysmudl part, each party lo pay h'.S own costs-</p>
- 8 Ky. 67Tarlton v. Briscoe (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the. Scott circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 69Scott v. Bealle (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of Henry. </p>
- 8 Ky. 71Ferguson v. Bullock (1817)
<p>Where a party’* remedy is complete at law, chancery will not entertain the case.</p>
- 8 Ky. 72Floyd's heirs & devisees v. Adams (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Scott circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 74Irons v. Luckey (1817)
<p>n . , „. On an appeal jrom a judgment qj" ^be Hull it arcitit coxirt.</p>
- 8 Ky. 75Kendal v. Baird's heirs (1817)
<p>On an appeal from the Nelson ( circuit court. '</p>
- 8 Ky. 76Gannon v. Alsbury (1817)
<p>Ore «a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Christian circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 81Jackson v. Tong (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a a decree of the liar-din circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 83Guthrie v. Wickliffe (1817)
<p>On a tortuous taking of gooda, the owner may bring either, trespass or rover; or if the goods have been sold, he may maintain as. sumpsit fertile price-II' the tort feazoi promises to pay for the goods,the owner may maintain asr sumpsit oq ' the premise.</p>
- 8 Ky. 84Gashweller's heirs v. M'Ilvoy (1817)
<p>The repon of viewers for ⅛1⅛1-1⅞' a through Pthe lands oi'Ueirs netd not re-uMnelVCiythe heirs; it' Í3 sufficient to ¾2 desnffiT tfo peraonisj to enable the couri tosum-üie</p> <p>Infant heirs Previed, need not be summoned ⅛?01'® f J-tem ;s aI,. pointed,</p> <p>Itisnotim-¾ the viewers» guardian to</p> <p>propertodis-place one guardian and t0 ¿e_ fend,</p> <p>. Construe*, ¾'seet° of the iq*. article of the constltlitlon-</p>
- 8 Ky. 86Hickman v. Grimes (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a a decree of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 87Jackson v. Jeffries (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a judg-merit of the Shelby circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 93Francis v. Hazlerig's exors. (1817)
<p>. The omis-vevmentUiat the vendor was “posses-indisputable* title,” is cur-eel by an aver-jnenuiiatthe “conveyed a c!ear indis-Se^u^in' substantially the same a-yermen*</p> <p>averring” he bed made a deed, reed t^the custody of a deed be-⅛⅞the veri dee.</p> <p>When a profert is ne-mission*must be taken ad-vAr>tage of bemre ver-</p> <p>Ths ancient rule was,that 'íions were denceagaisst a compu:—</p> <p>tute U differ-mt. I’eafet-’s 1 4 ec*as~ 5ted,'e Cai>tS |*‘A bib and decree is.suf-⅜°⅜⅛ ¡umi describ-f'l in a bond, decree, without shewing-cord^Onl" much of a record need be ^hewn as pointTnques' tion.</p> <p>In a suit on ditioned C°to convey “a clear and in-ofajuniorpa-tent on tte '1o'1td¿esho^f ved to shew incapacity in ^eC0P°^llp‘°‘r C01lvey‘</p> <p>bond the'evi-denee to ®be«v i^caps-beysuchas will shew an°tbe'‘ Í^confroveíít-the title. On such</p> <p>A pap*r fSíbondex" rented by a pllif. ought edVy a deft" vithoutpreof of its execu-</p> <p>petition for a rehear-⅜ in a 'UreenUlt the same parties, is not evidence for the 5</p> <p>er¡. dence may b* introduc’d to s!boundaries of land to be variant from fortín c»"p»! tent ordeed: vide printed decisions, Co»-hiU’s dé visees, Has. 5S9: Law!»⅜ ⅛.’iones.</p>
- 8 Ky. 97Barlow v. Hinton (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a (le-cree of the Barren circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 99Swann v. Wilson (1817)
<p>⅛ a „eh, erai mje that a tenant can-¡ort|>s title:-, but there are</p> <p>Ahis landlord’s ti-tie to have</p> <p>that the Undhasbeen decreed to himseIii</p> <p>Ortcst-rtie iandlord lias no right entry.</p> <p>A misno-tent mayóte corrected by referring- to survey &</p> <p>Parol evi-stevT sucl° misnomer is inferior to the ^ 0t ind <hewfore incompetent,</p>
- 8 Ky. 102Martin v. Lewis (1817)
<p>A contract uncler, sea!« \tself, unless by accident or "he trueTa-greement. if so, chancery „vide ante! Bacon’s adm. vs- Bac®£ & u“ pa'</p>
- 8 Ky. 105Braxdale v. Speed (1817)
<p>⅞⅛ be preí sumed by the appellate ot’Utbe''md°rment below, which is not vbh u'efhcts suited. * .F.rer'y thing</p> <p>In ' j-.ct. tha d^woo^ars continued*1* uninterniptM possersioivjf dispute'^ or thtpl/s’riglu ofentryisnot ownership for thattime, e</p>
- 8 Ky. 105Long v. Madison Hemp & Flax Co. (1817)
<p>tio^ canP°niy be bound by its seal, un-by statute,</p>
- 8 Ky. 107Abney v. Barnet (1817)
<p>ous defend’ts hold distinct Pal|ce!;L un_ nite in plead-⅛ they can-should have been sued se-P^ytely, tho’ common KUe & joint ¡>¼⅛. ™qU^e(j mte biwsA</p>
- 8 Ky. 108Rucker v. Tyler (1817)
<p> On an appeal from ajudg-ment °f Fayette cir-cult court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 108West v. Sanders (1817)
<p>Notes given by a resident dent'andTeft in the hands ofanother sidentiorcol-the credit of those notes t!lSk-sadv!m' a lien on the debt fortius andthe 1 le'nis not edifaf erthe advance the the demand: vd. Cowp. li</p> <p>. from^debts under the inK^e'lt laws nia'js'no^pro-tection 'h.re. If such notes of the payee, tho’ fora debt ^vas indebted to the payee, c.oll,^cst01' ¡⅛ to theex* tent of his ad-vanees,</p> <p>An assign-mentofadebt made ■witli creditors, will be post-creditors, whether they ifhavealienot</p> <p>If the bill a° dS^ct^of parties, but that factap-pear3 by the should’ have been urged by the answer therwise^the court will not ootice it.</p>
- 8 Ky. 112West v. Bartlet (1817)
<p> On appeals from the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 114M'Creery v. Pursley (1817)
<p>a fradulent deed will be aside iii íavor of a ere-ditor or pur-⅛ tbe^’hand” oí an innocent vendee.</p> <p>uteaffi-aud" «Sent deed void as to ere-chasrrs^óníy A purchaser of un' only ^avo'id such deed bv shewing the fioii To ^be'a creditor.</p> <p>And this can if- d.showíny ■»V judgment & execution,</p> <p>Ifthi sher-u„der the* e. ecu’n, he can °!% protect “g tS judgment & execution: a ⅛ can. not be more favored.</p>
- 8 Ky. 115Lee v. Metcalfe (1817)
<p>A contract compoaed of various parts, the essentials will not be dissolved if "re* unataaLv able: the in-jmed party will be left to <aw.</p>
- 8 Ky. 119Collins v. Frazer (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 121Current v. Commonwealth (1817)
<p>A person selling cider by tlle quart street, (ittte-ing the product of his own farm,) is not within the purview of the act restraining tip-ling houses-</p>
- 8 Ky. 122Pope v. Pendergrast (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Jefferson circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 129Galloway's Heirs v. Webb (1816)
<p> On appeal from Bourbon. </p>
- 8 Ky. 134Bodley v. Harris' Heirs (1817)
<p>An tr 1 Un/fo/ the lines of a sav-j^ywluchliad j^n corded, and possessed no yetvaUffiand shall be’ at-tachedtotbe survey was made, if that with certainty.</p>
- 8 Ky. 137M'Cracken's Heirs v. Bowmar (1817)
<p>On an appeal from the Wood-ford circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 140Moore v. Dodd (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Mercer circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 145Weathers v. Helm (1817)
<p>Art entry ad‘¡."j... which were notorious, and tiie line of another, who had a survey, but unrecorded & nol notorious, shall be construed to adjoin the line of the third survey, and r;ot the line of the entry.</p>
- 8 Ky. 147Fishback v. Major (1817)
<p>On an appecil frorn the Franklin circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 151Doe on the demise of Moody's heirs v. Walton (1818)
<p>I If several ejectment folding dis¡t nee¿ not be proved tha‘ they entered, Y>r held jointly.- ^ ⅛. Barnet.</p>
- 8 Ky. 151Ripperdan v. Scott (1818)
<p>Nt> new tt-i-granted on accountofab-sent^estimo-anpears, that ifthetestimo-senMiwouiion alter the re. suit.</p> <p>If the tót be'proved by the absent witness, is !⅛ .nr fuselyknown, no new trial ought to be eran led m consequence oftheabsence ofthewitness</p>
- 8 Ky. 152Doe on the demise of Clay v. Woods (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of Madison c’t.coH. </p>
- 8 Ky. 153M'Millan v. Brown (1818)
<p>pi’tf inej’t. for a town lot buTthe actestablish-ing the town an<i the sub' veyanceffom the trustees, unless the cte-¡ undera patent elder than the act</p> <p>xt is incident to legislative Sj'T t0 p*ránt larici*? anditmaybe done by statute' as well as ⅞⅛ Del cisions,Craig vs Trustees of the Seminary.</p>
- 8 Ky. 154Beall v. Siverts (1818)
<p> On an appeal from the Nelson circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 155Carpenter v. Hackley (1818)
<p>On appeal from a decree of the JVcZ* son circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 156Myers v. Irons' Ex'x (1818)
<p>On a joint recognizance ¿d a sci. fa retur-bait’ifhesur-renders the principal, all l Xcept as to costs: Aider J^ance^^rS been joint & several.</p>
- 8 Ky. 157Bank of Kentucky v. Todd (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Scott circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 158Lewis v. Smith (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse an order of the Franldin countv court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 158Dunn v. Meriwether (1818)
<p>SO», rt writ of error to reverse a decree of the Bul-lit circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 159Hart v. Brand (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 163Worthington v. Kennedy (1818)
<p>A verbal gift rf a slave '“so|) the law then re-(⅛⅛⅞.</p> <p>actualposses-' eicnoi«slave fov 5 years, w'iíl'^ve'ti’üe tothe'ho'der, is douh:ful; kut i1vPlíecl c;eariybI°will not.</p>
- 8 Ky. 165Graves v. Graves (1818)
<p>A purchase madefy one, benefitoftwo »nd a power °f attorney to both,takes t|,e esse out</p> <p>A as¿r tie under papers shewing' in-eresf'ofV noiher, is a purchaser and1 hnid1Ca’ trustee Sfor that other:— vid^Ambjsm 1 Oh Ca. 2h7, 2Ch.ea.Moor /vs. Bennet.</p>
- 8 Ky. 166Nichols v. Nichols (1818)
<p> On appeal from a de. cree of ike Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 166May v. Depuy (1818)
<p> Appeal from a judgment of the Henry circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 168Williams v. Briscoe (1818)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse d judgment of the Scott circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 169Prince v. Bearden (1818)
<p>A cleardis-tmctio.i is the law be tweenamort-dKoiv-fsal"" but it must be left to the circumstan-^ case°ancTthe sound discretion of the cideto which class ⅜ case may belong,</p>
- 8 Ky. 171Sublett v. Donaldson (1818)
- 8 Ky. 172Dean v. Tygert (1818)
<p>If a take a s¡i:on din of ⅛ £ Greeted Z ,«⅛1 to persons sUI-pesce) & ⅛6 deposu on ?-PPears to tho,e persons no farther r™sarvS "of 'being magistrates, a ,:ep,,siiion 83 miles off, IS Pnma fuc’e</p>
- 8 Ky. 173M'Dermid's heirs v. Morrison (1818)
<p> Appeal .from a decree Fayette circuit court of the </p>
- 8 Ky. 175Bradford v. Trustess of Lexington (1818)
<p>Oti an appeal from the Fayette circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 176Ball v. Jackson (1818)
<p>If t!le ^eft-edy^'it isTn chancery,</p> <p>considera- ™ tionofanote, furnishes no Williams-vs. Briscoe.</p>
- 8 Ky. 177Lee v. Craig (1818)
<p> SOn ari appeal from a decree of the Fleming cir'cuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 178Prather v. Norflet (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Pulaski circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 179Shadburn v. Jinnings (1818)
<p>. A judgment only between parties and pnvies — a impeach it.ay</p> <p>A plaintiff ma ’ Release thejudgment for the value, f.na proceed cific property.</p>
- 8 Ky. 181Williams v. Hensley (1818)
<p>. ^ 'his tenant notice t0 <lylt>tf t!l® ¡^"pjoticl uon under an adverse claim-</p>
- 8 Ky. 181Miller v. Hughes (1818)
<p>On appeal from a magment of ,, rrr J . v the Jejjerson circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 182Dorsey v. Dougherty (1818)
<p> On an appeal from the judgment of the Franklin circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 187Craig v. Major (1818)
<p>pronouncing' judgment of evicl.l0n> to miss,»n>rs under the occu. N™# claif‘ subsequent term, both parties being Present<</p>
- 8 Ky. 188Owings v. Shannon (1818)
<p>A witness m-rrio'” fcyinspecting a memoran-dm», but rem-mfers*1 the fact, his evidence ⅛ inadnussibie,</p>
- 8 Ky. 188Ewing v. M'Connel (1818)
<p>On an appeal to reverse ajudgment of the Jessamine circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 189Walker v. Duberry (1818)
<p>. Theadmis-the dissolution of evidence ™ gainst the <⅛.</p>
- 8 Ky. 189Briscoe's heirs v. M'Gee (1818)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the fielson circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 190Aills v. Voirs (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Lewis circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 191Grayble v. Froman (1818)
<p>Abefore ajus-tice of the P^ace> intend theserviceof a notice, ia not an official evidence</p>
- 8 Ky. 192East v. Matheny (1818)
<p> On an appeal from á decree of the Jessamine circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 193Cleveland v. Rodgers (1818)
<p>Qú an appeal from a (le-me of the Fayette circuit court/</p>
- 8 Ky. 194Clay v. Sweet (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Garrard circuit com. </p>
- 8 Ky. 195Thompson v. Jewell (1818)
<p>Where issue is tafeen uponan aver-performance ofacondition precedent, cuse for nonperformance, does n°'®U.P sue. 18</p>
- 8 Ky. 196Sanders v. Craig (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse an, order of the county court of Gallatin. </p>
- 8 Ky. 197Holt v. Trabue (1818)
<p>A successful claimant not^be* subjected ¡o the payment of rems or unmake, while ple land was him Pied</p>
- 8 Ky. 198Clarke v. Havens (1818)
<p>No legalob-ligation can becrea,ed on tickets m a lot-ter>'’</p>
- 8 Ky. 199Lewis v. M'Gee (1818)
<p>A patent !ssued to a tcT thc act of 1792, conferre d no riSllt></p> <p>'Provided act°the coní taonwealih had granted another^ to</p> <p>fbat act's only relates to"the Snterest° of the mesne patentee.</p> <p>spective only so far as to deciare* ^ arde-visee to the deceasecl a* 111⅛⅛⅛ shall take,</p>
- 8 Ky. 201Logan v. Cloyd (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Gar-rard circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 203Spears v. Toland & Son (1818)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Bourbon cir-r ettif court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 205Grimes v. Talbot (1818)
<p>Qn an a^eai jrgm augment > ^/' ^ycttc circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 207Smith v. Mitchel (1818)
<p>A possession taken under a junior pa. tent and out. side of the li nes of an elder patent, does not give possession within the elder patent.</p> <p>Occasional acts of ownership exercised 0¾ the land in contest, does not give possession, or toll a plaintiff’s right of entry.</p>
- 8 Ky. 207Bate v. M'Laughlin (1818)
<p>If it be ou-iected that not sworn to* it should not prevail, ifnot uhefinJuie^ ting.</p>
- 8 Ky. 208Mason v. Baker (1818)
<p>?** delay cretin-ors” Sers either or -mith-',ui</p> <p>perty uesori-ked in such saie’ |>0⅛5" ionoftheven-"",j°g e ()jp fraud. Vide 3 Coke’sRep. ess.’</p> <p>A court of tween ** the parties will neither enforce or^va-fraudulent conveyance, but leave the IsvvUeS t0</p>
- 8 Ky. 211Dixon v. Sharp (1818)
<p>j ^ execution,on the bid of the sheriff con-even though the she. iff hid as the ⅜¶ gent of another-</p>
- 8 Ky. 212Bratton v. Bryan (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Warren circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 214Baird v. Rowan (1818)
<p>Jlppeal from $ judgment of th$ Mkon C. C.</p>
- 8 Ky. 217Sneed v. Reardon (1818)
<p>An officer's deed who the statute is complid with uLscs thtft? tie to the purchaser, thor uS-1 wh^h the executf’n issues be terwa. ds re-'tíhí’ a deed underasher-iff’s sale may teilhT^the execution under which rnad’^’eTif there’ is e-noug-h in the ceruint0 the execüti’n.thé title will pass to the pur-</p>
- 8 Ky. 219Wilson v. Davis (1818)
<p>Otui writ of error to reverse a decree of the JVelson circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 220Bedford v. Duly (1818)
<p>frto ⅛ f bill for con" fessed at the term to which isVarned to appear.</p> <p>But if the at^lr-t^erm be imeriocu-tory only, it Wll\„n”j 4be that cause alone.</p> <p>It ⅛ irregu-vey" '(where the tine re-s-s tee''Vith-ui givui^ a dfty to the ahsen-tee; but >n ITVR’ i Qf"* STUS the tnie is’in the mo: pee, and no gCypn-1^ V</p> <p>On opening a decree had ,f„tdrft"and rehearing the cause, regard j.® f¾? creej&ifthat decree gives ¡-ig-ht, the decree and all things dene s;‘loui¿ re* main unalter» e<i.</p>
- 8 Ky. 224Carrico v. Meldrum (1818)
<p>tna decía-licíous^irose-cittion, the only material ⅜⅞ ^hat “th" pro’secuion was procured ciousf1"nand without p-,-o-bable cause.”</p> <p>In the ab-Sl¿nc.f:?íp,ro,of' caUse,” ¡.he jur> may well mfermafece.</p>
- 8 Ky. 225Johnston's Heirs v. Mitchell's Heirs (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Bourbon circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 228Campbell v. Hopson (1818)
<p>. On a trans-ierci he liable if the obligor is '!ot s,llver‘t> the legal \il bíiiiy' of the</p> <p>suc‘¿a s“‘0^n mint, due dil-igenceonthe pltl. must be shewn,before ⅛® oefemTt.</p> <p>suchcoveuant the defend’t. sl^°^ted ⅛ ífá^t-se diligence,</p>
- 8 Ky. 230Owings v. M'Clain (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the. Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 231Blair v. Hardin (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a <fe-cree of the Franklin circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 233Trabue v. Coleman (1818)
<p>On an appeal from, a judg- , ment of the Bourbon circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 233Voorhies v. Graham (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Frank-tin circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 234Lee v. M'Daniel (1818)
<p>A land lord «tttinga te nant on ius an intent to gain possess-his’tena'n no hound")" "⅛ ipso facto in possession to hií patín* °</p> <p>A patentee t0 atl 0CCupantf vikoseposwi-acquires pos" session only the limits p^tT —vide post, Waugh vs. aná '</p>
- 8 Ky. 235Stephenson v. Taylor (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Clarke circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 236Craddock v. Craddock (1818)
- 8 Ky. 237Colyer v. Langford's adm'rs (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Rockcastle circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 238Alexander v. Garrard (1818)
<p>On an appeal from a judg* went of the Clay circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 238Barnet v. Kennedy (1818)
<p>Tf T tion, arising from a ^iect'"forms" m>e<cáuse "m continuance, -</p>
- 8 Ky. 240Abney v. Brownlee (1818)
<p>On a writ of error td reverse a decree of the Jldair circuit c't.</p>
- 8 Ky. 241Thomas v. Bowdry (1818)
<p>On an appeal from cl decree of the Woodford circuit10 court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 242Wickliffe v. Hickman (1818)
- 8 Ky. 242Meridith v. Hickman (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 243Trustees of the Jefferson Seminary v. Wagnon (1818)
<p>T^ Vey b ing found on the lo ⅛⅛ certi-ficateof sur-reP^' i-fyer” as the boundhy.will the rtrcr^anV'o-verreach the cail °f ⅛⅜ course.</p>
- 8 Ky. 243Davenport v. Tarlton (1818)
<p>On ihe re-cteiv i>!. n>n of ■mortgaged SioVcRV, me mortgagee is ..•mswerab’e and not for Vnñc \v;-.s 20-tuaüv made 1¿y the slaves.</p>
- 8 Ky. 245Turly v. Rodgers (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a fudg-merit of the Harrison circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 246Barlow v. Bell (1818)
<p>A possess- or of lawl euhei' in law or equity,but beiievio^ it ■/"⅛ x-° by the rai principles ort quay eo-pcn«it>on for lijs mueiiora-Lous. it boiici Jide to be bis own, is</p> <p>’ But if he im* ntnowietijje that ¡lie land is not i.is,Jie nt0Cv¡dé pós(,8'ír,-ggs vs. Toyiar &</p>
- 8 Ky. 247Robertson v. Roberts (1818)
<p>An attachment must is-bounty where ⅛debtorre-sides, or last Iessl^|rt! anoti,erc<>unty, the pro-ceedmg is</p> <p>If issueil from smother county n nei-⅛ absconding <1- btor or his ^ garnishee.'</p> <p>Thos the judgment on the attachment be be-fóte the assignment of the garnishee's note, yet is he answerable to the assignee.</p>
- 8 Ky. 247Scroggs v. Taylor (1818)
<p>Vd.an.* — Bar* low vs Beil-</p>
- 8 Ky. 250Colston v. M'Vay (1818)
<p>Adferdant mayJ~defend himself by shewing an standing °patent for tóe</p>
- 8 Ky. 251Hughes v. M'Gee (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Mercer cir-cwit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 252May v. Slaughter (1818)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Nelson circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 252May v. Johnston's executors (1818)
<p>IOn an appeal from, a decree of the general court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 253Taylor's heirs v. Perkins (1818)
<p>Tenants in common cannot .,ecover mise: the al-kga'a & put-¿o*®, must</p>
- 8 Ky. 253Grubbs v. Pickett (1818)
<p>The correspondence of lines and corners found on the ground, wit a those called for in the patent, may be proved by ..others than the surveyor and chain men, without accounting' for their absence</p> <p>When a. landlord defends and pleads for hi9 tenant, the habere facies rigió fully issues? vs the tenant in pos-</p>
- 8 Ky. 254Cocke v. Conigmaker (1818)
<p>The lex h-debt ■ is co itríkctéd, shoukl ¡>ov-of Kentucky on gestiona of interest.</p>
- 8 Ky. 254Head's administrators v. Oliver (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Franklin circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 255Stewart v. Wilson (1818)
<p>A warrant of forcibis andtie" ⅛⅛⅛ ed unless Uie paiintilf hatn the luid.</p>
- 8 Ky. 255Grubbs v. Pickett (1818)
<p>On an ap-pneauon for ;t sindispen-sibte to snew ^1-^" witness,</p>
- 8 Ky. 256Kessinger v. Mumford (1818)
<p>On an appeal from a judg-rnent of the Hardin circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 257Wagnon v. Clay (1817)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Fayette civ-cuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 258Prewit v. Smith (1818)
- 8 Ky. 259Cox v. Osburn (1818)
- 8 Ky. 259Smith v. Reed (1815)
On an appeal from a decree of the Bourbon circuit court. presented the following petition to the court:-— To the honorable the Judges of the Court of jUppeclts. The counsel for the appellant making declaration of their respect for the opinions of this court not superinduced so to do by the hollow forms of judicial proceedings, but in candor and sincerity, would nevertheless ask of this court to review the decision given in this cause.
- 8 Ky. 271Marshall v. Russel (1817)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Mason circuit court. </p> <p>The counsel for the appellee petitioned for and obtained a rehearing. The cause was re-argued at the Spring Term, 1818, when the former decree was affirmed and ordered ÍG Stand unaltered.</p>
- 8 Ky. 272Debell v. Marshall's heirs (1818)
<p>another, cannot pre-of that other is shewn,</p>
- 8 Ky. 273M'Cracken v. Church (1818)
<p>A claim ap-pendant o» a ^Mch^caUs f r more lo-eauve ob-ca^®t be sustained, unless all the are</p> <p>Aappli« continuance1 should shew material-ityofthe absent witness, and due diligence.</p>
- 8 Ky. 274Church v. Macey (1818)
<p> On an appeal from, a dé -, cree of the Franklin eir-suit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 275Howard v. Todd (1818)
<p> On pml from a decm the decree of Hencmt court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 278Spurr v. Trimble (1818)
<p>As a notary Uw to recocí a power of at - copy'of such power ceni-</p> <p>⅛7° tion^f death seven ,eal’s S,b'!encemmt be from the ;ounirv of As a deed under real a tlt!a Ü10 not re* ?°ta makea deed* must be derseal, bui recorded.1 be</p> <p>A p of ato. if not ed, should be jccted ti'; if not objected to,it must be have'111 been proved, o-the.oiijeetion</p> <p>t jects °found on the ground with those the^entr*1' ⅛ k ve y per-suasiye meat m .aver</p> <p>In the ab-lfe-⅛ pre-emption* notoriety ⅛ m'iispensib.e</p> <p>If. ™”™!! adverse possession will nrote^t f possession must be of the land ia conies ti</p>
- 8 Ky. 281Bealle v. Houston (1818)
<p> On an appeal from the Breckenridge circuit court; </p>
- 8 Ky. 282Violet v. Bowman (1818)
<p>On an appeal from a decree tjf the Franklin circuit court,</p>
- 8 Ky. 284Millar v. Frame (1818)
<p>When the lines of anew "eacli should be equal, mi-ther callst , try are indefinite, line</p> <p>The call fo5the ¿, ple gi!le_ ral vague, as a locative '</p>
- 8 Ky. 287Ogle v. Ship (1818)
<p>It a morta-to redeem be' ger corn's in must pay up not oub* *,le subsequent advances mide by the' iTicrtg-agce.</p> <p>But in a condi tiorial sale, to be avoided by the paymerit Of a sum certain on or before a given day, if before the day the .sum is tendered, the vendee has no right to retain the property ’til other advan- • ces are paid On a con-⅞ liona! sale, if vendor tenders the money and it is refused, he shall have his costs.</p>
- 8 Ky. 288M'Curdy v. Dudley (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Franklin circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 290Carson v. Commonwealth (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to u-verse a judgment of tht Shelby county court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 291Morrow v. Hart (1818)
<p>After a sufficient!ev\ on a ■ • debtor s ⅛ tiabie tono further dis-^the 4<ro°e^ tyL detained from him.</p> <p>Bott!iepro-restored, the debtor is 1⅛ ble to a new</p>
- 8 Ky. 293Finlay v. Humble (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Harrison circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 295Luckey v. Rowzee (1818)
<p>Aliho", m thegeneral.it pí’íí may maintain cove:ian‘,a.te exceptions,</p> <p>The trae distinction is, that where thp covfiniint creates theii-ability, the action canon tained o*n the covenant; but wherethelaw ability5 hide-pendent of the covenant, áte may L be soughtit the covenant,</p>
- 8 Ky. 296Holeman v. Coleman (1818)
<p>An obl'-'or to make °a and uf'k.d" is not absolví «A bom his ⅞⅛"by deed* "with p-oper cove-]>e d'er;¿f,s t;_ tie fi- >m gov-ermnent; and L’^eiving!^8 such deed inspec-g00d,</p> <p>Aforefthe suit” does not pre-the'natae of the obligee, unless the assignment is renord.0n ^</p> <p>If the jury, find more arFTaicflri the writ, and the court low we term ot trial, correct it, it is not error.</p>
- 8 Ky. 298Knox v. Black (1818)
<p>Ohg yen(lK secures the repay mem of mong" advanced, & legal interest ^edemp* don, it is n-suriana,</p>
- 8 Ky. 300Embry v. Millar (1818)
<p>Altho’ the absence of a bill of salé may be accounted for, yet if, its execution be not admitted (or proved,) parol evidence of its contents sit'd be rej ected-</p> <p>The sue-cession to per-sonai proper, tv i no msttfif where being) pursues the laws of where °a'"⅛-cedent was dormciled & -rert/ is gov-emed by the *aws ot tl,c where the propertymay bs-</p> <p>c¡i»din a f> reign coun-but has p!'rfyna¡lerej administra- ’ sMl be fhe court of the county where the ur°pertymay beatthetime 0f his death.</p> <p>Where the properly of a decedent is wholly in a foreign country, and some of it is bro’t to. this, after his death, no administration can be granted here, but the ad-minístralo? app°1:^. “j country,1 may act here.</p>
- 8 Ky. 305Prior v. Lucas (1818)
<p>The17-98 e ing any per-t0 rec?T* better] to his own use, is ‘'upereeded directs the to be qui ⅛⅛ does not prescribe the hat of (798 pr sfcr&es that oVr^cúon'10" ' A declara-t r,n uncter cUdmlng^the recovery as vve,!,f,,r the ⅛'faulty; it s’-ould claim ** ⅛ t^cmrrtg levy ^ P1'^ F11 OTitisindebt frr money, "ot <le* £ or pro" p •</p>
- 8 Ky. 306Bank of Kentucky v. Haggin (1818)
<p> On an appeal /ran d judgmH.ofthe Fay-ette circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 308Lyon v. Ross (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Bourbon circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 310Cox v. Osburne (1818)
<p> On an appeal from, a decree of the Nelson circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 310Morgan v. Bealle (1818)
<p>A deed proved by statg, and by one before id clerk of court where the lands üe, cient1 roofot the execution of the deed. a deedPUms^s proved is not evidence. To render x proof o’f the cíe d must be render'itv¡f lid creditors and purchasers.</p>
- 8 Ky. 312Black v. Jones (1818)
<p>A deed made by a mother to shortly1 be-tore her second mar-ledge of the second hus-fraud on his marital rights Shd will not be decreed.</p>
- 8 Ky. 312Dewees v. Richardson (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Brackenridge circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 313King v. Walker (1818)
<p>To⅜ fer ' retiSfo£ a rteyy trial, should be ample and o^tar‘y maoe</p> <p>No laches should beim-the^'licant ica .</p>
- 8 Ky. 314Keizer's heirs v. Adams (1818)
<p>In an action ance¿. tor, thejudg-own ⅛⅛</p>
- 8 Ky. 315Taylor v. Steele's heirs (1818)
<p>Ifstrickea * off to the monwealth ment”0""t-x"" es and re^ deemed "by their pay-the^time^ii" mitedbylaw, the owner i-íds^mAgánales‘-right. The regís-ter’s reseipt toprov? tr?e redemption.</p> <p>0f a stranger on the lands another having1 seizin in law only, may he an ouster but is</p> <p>\t common law the fact disseizin 'to tell the right of entry, it ™as th.e castr from a person having seizin ofthemhen-means,</p> <p>fTlie rig'>t ⅞⅛ the póssess-uniawful- ^ obtai,'eA was a naked one, but the descent cast j^esof toH fealor ⅛ in possession ’ fore prima fa-lawful, ^ nbyu o^-dinary action</p> <p>As the heir by t’the<des' cf-nt from one skz’aof tiie inheritance, epparentrig-’t of possession,. it was imma-v-haf i fousier the possessiou ot lhe, cibtatffed'</p> <p>jneachihe r ghtfijl ow- ’ f-hu>fentr* "⅛⅛1 roust resort to his ac-tiai-i.</p> <p>. By particu-iar statute, i'.w has* in cases of dis-f ⅞1’ Shar>Re as to'require 5 rears pus-session, tog-e-des-ent'c st to "toil the i-ight of en-'⅛¾ npt apply to ¡.ny other species of "</p> <p>" a decent ⅛ no ,c tse tolls the r:ffht °^eelu covertdnfrnt6 person of ml iffnememorv, or (hose absent from the coitmtT, to none of- bora ⅛⅛ n-e as-cubed.</p> <p>When the rightful owner . cannot maintain lire-but has only a right of entry* his not ¡olid hy a descent cast and five, years lapse.</p> <p>As the rightful owner can only nMUiita„¡n real action on oclual seizin wd taking explees,a des. cent cast and the lapse of uve yea¡ s do' not toll his right of entry, unless be hath had actual seizin.</p>
- 8 Ky. 320Helm v. Slader (1818)
<p>gn an appeai j^om iAg circuit court of Hardin.</p>
- 8 Ky. 321Kendal v. Talbot (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of ‘ the Nelson circint court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 323Commonwealth v. Clarke (1818)
<p>On an appeal from a judg-meni of the Jefferson cait court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 325Owings v. Patterson (1818)
<p>Efac* t¡ie compltV right to reco-anii nei-e^tob'/withl ¡n the deft’s knowledge, vt.¿</p> <p>That the are ifnot admitted by ^eCp’al* -F™'</p>
- 8 Ky. 326Patterson v. Deering (1818)
<p>On ajumt of error to ve» veregfa jiMgment of the Greenup circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 328Church v. Steele's Heirs (1818)
<p>Although a propes’dcom-promise (made to de-peRd on the happening of events) may become inoperative by the failure of those events, and will not be decreed; yet if the proposal contains admissions of facts, it may be used to prove those facts..'</p> <p>If a valuable part of a contract is performed, it will be decreed, ⅜¾’ ⅝ part comparatively inconsiderable is omitted, particularly if the party claiming the contract hath not refused to perform the part omitted.</p>
- 8 Ky. 330Hamel v. Lawrence (1818)
<p>A tenant riSming into possession , tinder alease, cannot be permitted to controvert Ivslandlord’s title.</p> <p>A former warrant having been quashed,because of a defect in the warrant, does not bar a second inquest.</p>
- 8 Ky. 331Bullitt v. Ralston (1818)
<p>in a suit turning on va, some SuPp0r-ted by the X)’u!dC ⅞⅝ for the plt’f as to those is-for thedef’t. as toothers,</p> <p>pnbamli, lies on the de-⅛'1 reduces Pvicience to sustain the ⅛-s“e- ,1.’1® i'“’y (,⅛, Without proofs for pf'f-</p> <p>In a suit on a bond where deft, traverse . the consideration generally,&fails in his proof, the pioduotion of the bond is prima facieev idence of consideration; but if pi'iff replies a special consideration lie takes on himself the burden of proof, and must shew the special consideration — the bond is not competent e-yideiice.</p> <p>Evidence liable to the acil0n but not súpport-⅛üíe is?ue |sienp™ rejected by the court,</p>
- 8 Ky. 333Chiles v. Stephens (1818)
<p>⅛ turned out possession privy- xa the judgment,he awrít offoi" cible entry & detainer.</p>
- 8 Ky. 334Stephens v. Chiles (1818)
<p>A man turn’d out by a writ •'othrb fapos. issued on a judgment to which ne was neither party or privy, can-nc, succeed in a motion lor restitution,while he is in pursuit of ills remedy by warrant of forcible entry.</p>
- 8 Ky. 334Guthrie v. Bogart (1818)
<p> Oyn a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Bullitt; circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 335Sprigg v. Jarret (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Shelby cuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 336Drace v. Wyat (1818)
<p>In an action on a promise relating' to the sale of Juration need not state the promise to have been made in writing;, but to justify a recovery, the proof must be that the promise was written.</p>
- 8 Ky. 337Brown v. Wickliffe (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 337May's Heir v. Burton (1818)
- 8 Ky. 341Eastin v. Bell (1818)
<p>On an appeal from a judg-merit of the Henry circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 342Stillwell v. Harris (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to revene a judgment of the Shelby circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 343Whaley v. Eliot's heirs (1818)
<p>On an appeal from a decree of the Fayette circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 345Webber v. Kenny (1818)
<p> On tin appeal from, a judgment of the Bourbon circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 346Calk v. Lynx's heirs (1818)
<p> On an appeal from ajuetgment of the Montgomery circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 348Patterson v. Martin (1818)
<p> On a ivrit of error to reverse a judgment of the Warren circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 349Burnes v. Burton (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Mlsou circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 350Mussin v. Collins (1818)
<p>'On a mo* t'io-foranew trial it is not enough that t^e applicant should ao count for hi¿ absence at the trial, tie should also shew due di* licence in. preparing*, & t-»at because cfhisabsencé his preparation was unavailing.</p>
- 8 Ky. 351Montague v. Carneal (1818)
<p>, sdirfr -a-nezad biU go po-.vér to seis iancU,unless tue tes- . co^sr* ed such povvOr on the executor,</p> <p>A letter of ⅛⅞is revok’d by coverture, worth ofiand to each of ^eeto()cl'tli'. kg„n’ ”utetgf certain tracts v-!'ued and allotted,does vest in the devisees ’tit a valúa-foment** ⅛ then the fee to óneofthe devisees (be-‘"S' a,so ,on^ te;est before valuation ami by the sauT^</p>
- 8 Ky. 353Davidson v. Berthoud & Son (1818)
<p>la an action of money had and received, tiie receipt of a third person is not admissible evidence. To charge the deft the giver of the re ceipt should be personally », witness.</p>
- 8 Ky. 354Kennedy v. Dillon (1818)
<p>⅛- a't’ch-mentwiu not tieon an defttth"S ¡dwTOndelt” theaUegatioa ^“st ¿fese™ not m the past tense-</p> <p>^cas„ not wiihm “ the provisions statute taehmentsf cannot by Pleiyl!ns *?e ⅛</p>
- 8 Ky. 355Boothe v. Boothe (1818)
<p>In the "ea erai where an act ⅛ to demand, the crueñon oi damages of the property at the mand.0i</p> <p>But if the broken ⅞* covenant 'by selling the property to tefdr>1Veide’ mand s made the criterion of the property when the covenant the sale of the property.</p>
- 8 Ky. 356Skeene v. Fishback (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the. Jessamine circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 358Porter's heirs v. Howard (1818)
<p>•fhr*the veymice of haul ⅛ lodg'd as anSindem-iVity for the suretyship^ may hoTdthe bond nil he is ind: irmifi-'imresncTiien oh c-e’and-</p> <p>Nor will ? co“^' ⅛ sale,on the prayer of the sure,y>t,le a-í¡ver¡ng the bowl as anin-Aemmty, be-meley .If the sure-tv 11 ss Paid court^’vh'l sustain ids bill, praying a reimburse-rrent.</p>
- 8 Ky. 359Cartwright v. Trumbo (1818)
<p>On an appeal from a judgment of the Bourbon circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 360Clay v. Moseley (1818)
<p>pointed A deed from comre’is ap-under Ae act Sands^'íiní opcrative.uuless. founded hirrihoU di ¾ the title-</p> <p>no^ ^ppeaaCr' ing, it was correct to inne(;]^' ingpassedby the deed, ^</p> <p>, . , ment pursues the verdict, thattbejucij^ ment was for to? muell>no-cord to shew for how much</p>
- 8 Ky. 362Fraily v. Langford (1818)
<p>On a writ of error to res verse a decree of tte Lincoln circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 362M'Coun v. Sheriff of Fayette (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to nmrñ¿ a judgment of the Fay* ette county court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 364Davis v. Armstrong (1818)
<p>On an appeal from a judgment of the Montgomery circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 365M'Neil v. Dixon (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Warren circuit tourt. </p>
- 8 Ky. 366Strode v. Swim (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Fleming eifeuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 368Halbert v. Skyles (1818)
<p>Altho’ a tie ’tin chan-have defend ed the suit,it is not irregular to appoint ioners to coñ-vey at the 1,'7n The decree, provided a day is pi ven to perform the ifecree.</p> <p>Private a£,ts °re to tired by the court with-thenf163'1"18'</p>
- 8 Ky. 369M'Clellan v. Samuels (1818)
<p>In an' action of covenant it is error to assign that us a breach which the def’l has not undertaken to per-fbrn>.</p> <p>?f the «My of the def’d’t depends orv a contingency, the h«ppen-ing of the coniinerf ncy should be a* verred, to shew the defendant’s lia-</p>
- 8 Ky. 371Short v. Clay (1818)
<p>A paper b-^a^deed from coms’rs appointedun. ^reduce ⅛' ¡.oone the sc. v«alnets lor anceot Unds> is pot per se co^e, titled *</p> <p>To rend;* competent 01¿o„n£, court «¡«⅛⅜ tmg the com-sUouid be shewn.</p> <p>in the Cdeed thatthegran-tors were ⅛⅛’ ev'S deuce to the order of up-pomtment, & admissible*""</p> <p>\° rellder such deed operative, it should also be shewn that the holder of the tie was, at the date of the deed» a non residen*. If the bond under which the Conors have .cted, reci--s the holder of the title to be a non-resident, it will not be presum’d that he has r<-mov’d to this country. But to render such bond evidence at all against a stranger to it, proofmusibe adduced of execution.</p>
- 8 Ky. 372Head v. Hughes (1818)
<p>The act in-ci-e?smg the the peace, is •constitution-</p>
- 8 Ky. 375Kendal v. Slaughter (1818)
<p>. A declara, ^ent may^e amended by adding demi-ors- 0f the pltf.</p> <p>gf' lands^m his ex’ors for ^hisTbt!1' ”, ¿ w’;11 bp. pir-nam’d as exr. but who has jaded tcqual-^</p> <p>Aman purchasing 'a which ^as been survey. et*t ^ purchase not being meted) and entering survey possessed of the whole survey so en-lesssuchpos-session is re-stneted by iinpediment.</p> <p>patent issues and his pur-⅜⅞36 he^ V possessed to the extent of his purchase, of "the6 firs^ entry.</p> <p>The act of !^’⅞6162) ¿p^ded. ~</p> <p>The act of I0~> three years after disabil-l*y lm|ess" she was cov-when ;)cr accru</p> <p>The com-v r^tra'*i'st iiitSh,1 pr-e 38, sect 7tb, expounded.</p>
- 8 Ky. 381Moss' heirs v. Carrol (1818)
<p>ave ⅞ successful cUiumnts In the same su.t, take the val-ueofihekmi, nite "in^the conveyai.cel thry can no1, to pay for a pant of ⅛ ceivepay for part of the. imprav’m’is.</p>
- 8 Ky. 381Aills v. Key (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Lewis circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 382Wishart v. Cosby (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment.. of the Nelson circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 383Chambers v. Harrison (1818)
- 8 Ky. 385Crumbaugh v. Russel (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Logan circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 386Shackleford v. Talbot (1818)
<p>Justices of me peace jurisdiction in all con-v™ueoff<?50 Sunder —Vhie ante, f/rarf ts ; "•****'i,ccL</p>
- 8 Ky. 386Couchman's heirs v. O'Bannon (1818)
<p>A couri of c'wnpeiy ⅛⅛ tioníoreltevá against jrau-Atai devises j^f®1® that subjsc'., 0 V'l\ 5?*) ⅛⅞ feated by the °*</p>
- 8 Ky. 388Couchman's heirs v. Slaughter (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Nelson circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 388Fox's heirs v. Longly (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Fleming circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 389Patton v. Kennedy (1818)
<p>In an action of covenant, ty ItTsTn mi case necessa-rytoaverthat the land been tried; to aver an tren by a pa-¡¡'"sufficient^ and the superiority of betrie/inthe action on the covenant.</p> <p>tionexitebo-tween á enantof gen warranty and p-ahist a par-ticúlarclaim. llie/r3i »n rewsstirv “evict oñ and "«ie superior-such ~ aver-mentis re-^IlScf-iit■ ltQ aver an evic-tio:t under and (vheti.er the tide was tried at. ⅛") Tb-eárh ”of the covenant,</p> <p>in aiiaetion 1maww-aiy pontained in deed noi recorded, it ‘s„ ibeexecution of the deed, '!n!fss execution in issue,</p> <p>I1 f.,lch a cor¿ ;n ti,e c. jectment is e-v,l(ien?e,. vs. i he cleft to sheweri-.tion, but no ⅛.</p> <p>v£y 0,-3% port ⅛ the eject-meat is no made so by bill ofexcep-w°£°r°iheu therefore no evidence vs. t!je v*"arranN</p>
- 8 Ky. 391Kibby v. Rucker (1818)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Greenup circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 392Coleman v. Patton (1818)
<p>In a recog• nizance of special bail, taken before a justice of the peace, it is not essential to the liability of the bail, that the recognizance should be in-corporatedin the record, Stis enough if it be returned and filed a*-mong the papers. 1 Lit 494 Acts of 1796, chapt 264, sec. 33,</p>
- 8 Ky. 393Hay's heirs v. Connelly's heirs (1718)
<p>A person procuring possession of lands, under a contract of purchase, is no tenant so as to subject him to a warrant of forcible dfetamcf</p>
- 8 Ky. 394Foster v. Smoot (1818)
<p>•cannot U ⅛ maiuuined on ajurlgm’t action of"⅛-tinuefor tiie same proper-,y'</p> <p>4 cW’t h”s ⅛ ejection -1» deli ver the property or .pay the value.</p> <p>in a contract í'>1’nÍ1ief ^0" ™e,n may be ⅛-cha;S'ed by. for ⅛ imp to deliver the pro-the money, & not for 'the j.adl’re tn d'5' Uver</p> <p>^ (M™« ¡f ¡>⅛ afi terju iijnient. ⅛ property.' vlych is á£al , naymamtain a nciv action,-fhrthesrcmvl newc^use'm action.</p>
- 8 Ky. 396Rutledge v. Lawrence (1818)
<p>A deft, co-conveyllmds" and failing to do .so, the daffies ⅛ t¡V va'ue Of the land at the tune ot ascertained by the price given, or er evider.ee..</p> <p>Where the failure to convey lias been produced by the f aud of the vendor, á different nde prevails. 2 !3ibb, 543, Geraul t vs. Anderson.</p> <p>Fraud will not be presumed, it must be proved.</p>
- 8 Ky. 397Lee v. Davis (1818)
<p>On a lorit of error to reverse ment of the Woodford court. «>⅜-circuit</p>
- 8 Ky. 398Young v. Whitaker (1818)
<p>‘Covenav-s piea, when \he covenan- *°£ ™ a'Jven act, but it is im. mverialwhen ⅛ collateral ex. traneousmat-⅛ the^covenan-ter; yet the cured™by a verdict,</p> <p>jianty & ev;c! don after the tlle covenants performed by material, for as the heirs, ftc-!“'ebounc* nant, it c n-not be mate- or f '¡ie tle</p> <p>jt-er. ror alledged grows out of °an¿ is objected to by tue party offeringsuch bad ptea, the reversion his application, f°f h® fi-st fault.</p> <p>The pleaof ‘fe e admin-of1 ⅛ *asse"'1’ are snbstantially t he same, -ue oa either is found for thep’i’ fT, the amount of as-also be found-</p> <p>A guardian to defend for regularly'“to beappointed, and no bTerteredí gainst them until the guardían ap-</p> <p>after appearance, the guardian ne-Sae* a pro°per'defence, fhejudgment ''■iPst the in" flats, but they have their redress against the guardian.</p>
- 8 Ky. 401Long v. Carlyle (1818)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of ^00(V0'^ ciVcrtii court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 401Johnston v. Lewis' Administrators (1818)
<p>On an appeal from a judgment of the Green-up circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 402Sebre v. Eve's adm'r (1818)
<p>C:>n;iot* in that capacity rcc;"er a c|e‘ &,sl j-nteslata.</p> <p>1 The first decedent being r debted to the second decedent, the sdm’r of > lie 2d decedent may arrest ckbtsdue thr adm’rof the Istdeeedent, (he being a ñon resident) and apply them to the discharge of the demand.</p> <p>The pen-dency of a slut inasist.er state by anon resident against Ivs debtors resident here, should not prevent the chancellor from attaching' the debts due to such absentee in the hands of i*is debtors here, and apply them to the payment of cebis due by the absentee, but such absentee should be, a p-u-iy.</p>
- 8 Ky. 402Watkins' Heirs v. Eastin (1818)
<p>A locator of tnnds making rontractC1 to receive a part for his serví-MtkJf bruie Custom of the country to a-kindUt °f the</p> <p>His remedy is aU taw for a pecuni-sa'ioa°m^</p>
- 8 Ky. 405Cochran v. Thompson (1818)
<p>Vide ante, p 242, Wick-liffe & al. vs. Hickman, accordant.</p>
- 8 Ky. 405May v. Foushee (1818)
<p>Vide ante, p. 214, Baird vs Powan ⅝ al, affirmed.</p>
- 8 Ky. 406Coleman v. Morrison (1818)
<p>The estpb-lisument ofa town by the legislature,& of lands in trustees ⅛ a statutory uuUheesta-bUshment the town^ha-procured "by (he ciuunar't of cfahningthro Sii?n arc es-Í0Pe<l to al-óf^tiewhen the i-„w oass-e& Vide an-^’>^pwn^3' 1</p>
- 8 Ky. 407Ewing's Heirs v. Alexander (1818)
- 8 Ky. 407Forbis v. Bowen (1818)
<p>liv the act of Feb. 1815, (session acts 398')8and the act of Dec. Í815,(session acts of first settler was desUpietl tobepreter’d rey was the commencement of title.</p> <p>clabriant assignee of a eettier, the pre-emptxve^ jost.</p>
- 8 Ky. 409Allen v. Gant (1818)
<p>^ on motion far t0 P'jy collected "on exe’n, unless ⅛ the county* or names árí agent res’dt. money of the sheriffVithin ^sonal^s-T plication or written ord-«t</p> <p>hávíno^refus* ed tcTpay to «tt’ney at !aw (reSl(\ent m another county and having no writtea order from the plaintiff in execution,) does not subject him to judgment on the motion.</p>
- 8 Ky. 409Gaither v. Brooks (1818)
<p>In an action On a covenant of warranty, the transcript of the record in ejectment is compelen! to shew the eviction, but n;-' to shew tbp superiuH- ^ tyof titie, unless the war-rantor had notice of'the pendency of the ejectnA.</p> <p>To prove such notice, a copy of a notice to that e.ifectand the affidavit annexed, taken from among the papers in she ejectm’nt is incompetent, not being the best evidence of which tbe case is sns-"■heptibie.</p> <p>To shew the quantity of land for which the eviction had been, the copy of thé survey in the e-iectment ⅛ incompetent-</p> <p>, Vide ante, j> 389, Patton vs. Kennedy.</p>
- 8 Ky. 410Latham v. Ford (1818)
<p>On an ap-a j.fsl¡ce> no declaration is necessary,, if tion.</p> <p>_ Want of ju-cannot be ob! ⅛ an aPP®al> if ,a {⅛⅛.</p> <p>C⅜⅛ ⅛ debitutns «:⅛ ¡a„‘ are«>hh-in tiie jm-is- “ of a jusacc..</p>
- 8 Ky. 412Coleman v. Henderson (1818)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Harrison circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 417Ellis v. Horine's devisees (1818)
<p>us’d,it should construed “e Jú-tece&r.*.</p> <p>s’irction0011 should be g--ven to a» entry as to word have an operative ef-ieet.</p>
- 8 Ky. 418Patrick v. M'Millan (1818)
<p> SOn an appeal from a decree of the Clarke circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 419Landrum v. Hite's heirs (1818)
<p>«. ,, , , Orí an appeal from a. decree of the Ohio circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 421Wilcoxen v. Rix (1819)
<p>Covenants are either express er implied; to create an express covenant, no technical words are necessary; but there musí h. an ag-ree- . ment to do, or abstain from doing a particular thing.</p> <p>An implied covenant is created by the legal o-peratio.i of certain technical words, and relates only to the realty.</p> <p>A receipt given for pvo-pcriy tviJi a promise annexed “to sell thssavne” will not sustain a,i action oí* covenant for-failing to pay over the proceeds; a n ilher iorm cf action is the proper remedy.</p>
- 8 Ky. 423Iron's Ex'x v. Callard (1819)
<p>On a motion to qm shf an execution and sale, unless the error is apparent on the face of the ex’n, a notice to the pltf in ex’ii is necessary, if it be not waived Byap. pearance.</p>
- 8 Ky. 423Graham v. Hackwith (1819)
<p>A vendor selling land to whxh lie has no title either in law nr equity; if he acquires a title after-wards, - he should convey to the Vendee</p> <p>If such ven-3or, after he acquires title, conveys the land to another, he is answerable to the first ven-dee for the value of the land at the date of the conveyance. Vide 2 Bibb, 543, Gerault vs. Andér.-on; Hard. 41, M>-Connell’s h’rs vs. Dunlap’1 devisees, and ante, Rutledge vs. Lawrence.</p> <p>In a suit in chancery, praying relief for a los-writing, tho’ strictly, the party should make affida-vitoftheloss, yet if . the proof of the loss is clear, the affidavit of the loss may be dispensed with</p> <p>Exceptions to the reading depositions should be special-— that they are taken “contrary to law” is too gere-r:.l to be noticed, nor need the depositions be signed By the witnesses-⅛-Vtde post, MobUy vs. Hamit acc.</p>
- 8 Ky. 425Shackelford v. Purket (1819)
<p>A vendor ⅛ posse ,sion may protect ' tfedeed under which fraudulently obtained, h^'done""'^ the evidence of su.b' scrib,ng' Wlt></p> <p>But the declarations of n absent subscribing witness is in-compete;,!; — • - ur.h d, c'ai-a-ions are only admissible to’ 1' ¡peach the cr-dit of a witness.</p>
- 8 Ky. 426Buford v. M'Daniel (1819)
<p>In a joint scüomigáínst t\vo on a joint undertaking, it is’ error to -enter judgment ag.úíít, one while the cause is un-disposed of against the ci-ther: Vide ante, page 59, Jouit vs. Simpsen.</p>
- 8 Ky. 426Forman v. Rodgers (1818)
<p>A vendor setting land by bo:id, for a part of which there is an adverse eider patent, may be joined ill the action brought . by the vendee to quiet the title — secus if before bring* ing the suit the vendor hadconvey’d.</p> <p>If a vendor is abie to make. a title for a part only of the bnd. sold, the election devolves entlie vendee to take the ti-, tie for so much as can be made, and go for damages as to the rtmainder.or go fir damages as to the wi'.oL: liar. 41. r cc .</p> <p>The jurit-dieti-.n of ⅜ court of than-cory ¡i;e at-lached, wijl. not be dives% ed by a lis ypendens ex pa~ e procedure.</p>
- 8 Ky. 428Forman v. Rodgers (1819)
<p>The assign- or of an obligation da'ed since 1792, fihouid be u party to any sub in chance y br<*ugi.i on ihe bond.</p>
- 8 Ky. 429Caldwell v. Holly (1819)
<p> On an appeal from, a judgment of the circuit court of Bath. </p>
- 8 Ky. 430Dedman v. Martin (1819)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Montgomery circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 430Mitchel v. Wayman (1819)
- 8 Ky. 430Kinsler v. M'Millan (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the ■ Harrison circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 431Riley v. Nugent (1819)
<p>in esses of n'ew triat s< ou!d be ¡'ranted be-nn¡ess the damages so ouira' i^ewthem¡o be the result of passion or coltfption,</p>
- 8 Ky. 432Riley v. M'Gee (1819)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Grayson circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 433Bullock v. Beemiss (1819)
<p>Although there may be ho actual fraud in making a contract, yet a totalinability on one side to fulfil it, discharges the otherparty.</p> <p>Gross negligence for an unreasonable time to dothatwbich was incumbent on him. to do, is equivalent to fraud, and jus lines a dissolution of the contract</p> <p>On rescind-ingacontract of s-.de, if the vendee has liad possession of the subject matter, he must account with die vendor for the profits exceeding the improvements.</p>
- 8 Ky. 435Carstarphen v. Graves (1819)
<p>Tort , contract can->yot be joined in one UPC!a' tau0,1'</p> <p>The knowledge & con-pcaimen! of unsour.dness in property sold, does not Imply a pro-in ¡seofsounclness,and thus convert a tort into a contract. A vendor thus situated is nevertheless liable to the action of the vendee ■ — but it is on the deceit or fraud of concealing a known defect.</p>
- 8 Ky. 435Shackelford v. Kennedy (1818)
<p>An entry „ot'surveyed ’til 1809. is forfeited, un-orshews himself to come under resmotioní2 of the act of 1785.</p>
- 8 Ky. 436Talbot v. Bowen (1819)
<p> On a uiritof error to reverse a dUcree of the Henderson cir-cult court </p>
- 8 Ky. 438Broadhead v. M'Alister (1819)
<p>The coin* cidenceofob. jects found on the land, with those called for in the patent, is sufficient to justify a find-mg for a pl’tf in ejectment.</p> <p>Tho’ the lines and cow ners of a sur. vey were originally marked by an unau. thorised surveyor: yet if a deputy af-terwards reports them, the fair inference is, that the deputy had gone on the lands,and had recogni-sed the boun. dary as marked.</p>
- 8 Ky. 440Coleman v. Casey (1819)
<p>A mere e-rjnity is no de-fence in an e-jectment.</p>
- 8 Ky. 441Wells v. Caldwell (1819)
<p>On an appeal from a judgment of the Nelson circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 441Scott v. Patton's ex'or (1819)
<p>Acovenant enured. into b onr 111 fa* hers< cannot be sued on by the two to . with a third person,</p>
- 8 Ky. 442Heath v. Allin (1819)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Mason circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 444Chiles v. Patterson (1819)
<p>settlingwUh1-tfui claim <v the lands oí entitled.*STo corapensatiV for improvements.</p> <p>guc[l settler purchasingiu * claim after ject the site, ctssfulclaim-pavements vnadewithout ^tie-</p>
- 8 Ky. 446Register v. Haggin (1819)
<p>T¡(e ^ section of the compact with' Vn-gmia remarked up^ 1 Littell, 1Í5.</p> <p>An entry for lands conferred no right ¡ unless the entry was a valid one.</p> <p>The acts o' J'eb’rv. 10' !>, 1816, 5 Lit p* 373 and 423, do not infringe the «ompact.</p>
- 8 Ky. 449Robertson's heirs v. Crawford (1819)
<p>1⅛« writ of error to reverse > a decree of the Shelby circuit court ) cuit court</p>
- 8 Ky. 450Thomas v. Head (1818)
<p>A pl’tff m no right a-mena his declaration, by 'ff' lands and in favor of ano-thcr lessor, shews good cause, c'rctm’t ma" defeat ^he pi’tff’s action ⅛ eider'o'uf standing tent in another — ■vide ColT°v anie pa V5Ó,"acc’í.</p>
- 8 Ky. 450Bearden v. Wood (1819)
<p>A contract will not be decreed specifically, unless the com-pi’t. has paid or offered to p^y »he consideration on which the contract was entered into.</p>
- 8 Ky. 451Wood v. Fox's Heirs & Ex'or (1819)
<p>On an appeal from a de* cree of the Bracken cir-cult court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 452Maury v. Waugh (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a judg-menl of Ike Mason circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 453Elliot v. Lewis (1819)
<p> On an appeal from an order of the Wooaford county court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 454Crisson v. Williamson (1819)
<p>Bvlhejaw 0f ¿erchants as wet} as the common law, severa¡ ' ac. t.ioiis vs. the drawer,^en-cep^ 0f ¿ protested bill of exchange.</p> <p>Tof K^ms^y (2 Lit tot,) gives a. joint aftKU'Vle bills only, leaving (as to er '[⅛ 0f bills as they stood at conn AW'</p> <p>In the casé of a foreign bill, the srat, does not re-< s'rain the' holder from bringing several actions gainst the drawer, &c. but if. he chooses to depart from the ccmraon law fie mast pursue tlie star, anti u-uite all concerned.</p> <p>Holies of protest sent by a notary public and by mall to an endorser, is suf-iicient notice to such endorser of the protest.</p>
- 8 Ky. 454Smith v. Welch (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Hardin circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 457Lawless v. Helm (1819)
<p>'On eviction, tile remedy of the vendee is whollyatiaw, on the covenant of warranty: if application be roads tó a chancell’r for compensati’n the bill sho’ld he dismissed without prejudice, the chancellor, having- no jurisdiction.</p>
- 8 Ky. 457Ewing v. Ford (1819)
<p>In suit^ oa contract, a! are liable, judgment £amst ,7le’ wCh catilfaction, is no tar to vha pi’ifl’s others '0</p> <p>iort' several are'h-able, noihng short of i a satisfaction from one, will bsr-</p>
- 8 Ky. 459Calmes v. Ament (1819)
<p>in chancery ^ ontiiedU-coveryofthat f thmanct C°oj discontinue, A compl’l</p> <p>If h* ⅛ not be indut-S" 'l with a htliofl'evieV''</p>
- 8 Ky. 460M'Kinny v. Kenny (1819)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Bout* bon circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 462Clay v. Ballenger (1819)
<p> On an appeal. </p>
- 8 Ky. 463Jenkins v. Green (1819)
<p> On a writ of error. </p>
- 8 Ky. 463Carter v. Kilburn (1819)
<p>tardy must be had in the couniy'»here resides?'^1111*</p>
- 8 Ky. 464Bradford v. Patterson (1819)
<p>On an appeal from a dc-cree of the Fayette circuit court. .</p>
- 8 Ky. 465Casey v. Allen (1819)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Union circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 468Lynch v. Sumrall (1819)
<p>Although a quiringjnris-tlie'"' urpose of discovery, will, in some' cases, retain it for the purpose of relief, yet he will-not in every case.</p> <p>He will do so in cases where he is competent to g a relief by his v,vn proper .pevvor, but if foreign*' aid is necessary (as a jury) to ascertain .the extent of the relief, he will aid the law tribunal by-forcing a discovery, and' thenleave the parties- to i%w: Vide ante 24, Handly’s ex’or vs. VitzhugW • & ante, Jenkins vs. Green.</p> <p>Under par. tjcular circumstances, a to's "'corner was made "be-yand .the ^ance^ called tenq a'party in pursuit of tsvat corner d-stance."</p> <p>a call for a yisibleobjec wph another call fur a ⅞11*’ noft íe senses,0 yáU control the ob =ec'S1 p:r 271, m r-süallvs. Rus-c^és*ftíth“re cited. ⅛</p>
- 8 Ky. 469M'Cracken's Heirs v. Stayton (1819)
<p> On an appeal from an opi-nian of the Washington circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 471Ackler v. Oldham (1819)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse an order of the Pendleton county court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 471Carneal v. Sthreshley (1819)
<p>A guardian ail "item having neither appeared nor answered, it is irregular to take a bdl as confessed against in- • fants Vide ante, Young vs Whitaker & al-</p>
- 8 Ky. 472Elliot's Heirs v. Garrard (1819)
<p>The (l Lit °2551 dyes „ot pro. tect ligands ion ihe**non-pay-0i<" n.cnt of taxes, but it pi elands* cf ⅛¶ -Fains fi*o:r) forfeiture,for °mer"f’them ⅜ taxation</p>
- 8 Ky. 475Bealle's Adm'r v. Schoal's Ex'or (1819)
<p>A covenant reciting ⅛a» tor AnTsoW someioú,im-piies a covenant ⅛ con vev, not that he has con-yeyed</p> <p>Acovenant \!te, k, Wuy OT If:G' tat, is litjatory as ITiv tiie agree-merit.</p> <p>A defend’t ydiilst mak-a right to file asmany issuable pieas as he thinks proper, but after issue joined and the cause continued, he ceases to possess that right at the m xt term, to permit or refuse such pieas is then discretionary with the court, and its exercise (un: less much abused) will not be revt sed.</p> <p>If the damages found are greatqr than those laid, the excess must bp released bs-fore judgm't, or not at all.</p>
- 8 Ky. 477Mills v. Metcalf (1819)
<p>A comp’lt, tilo’ he may maintain an action at law forthe breach of a covenant may, if he elects to do so, resort to equity for a specific execution-, he may also give his prayer a double aspect, either that the contract be decreed sped iipaUv.ci dis-shlved.</p>
- 8 Ky. 479Waggoner's Trustees v. M'Kinney (1819)
<p>Where a re rnedy is am” pie at. law, ehancerywill "íamfreiih vs.Hiimphres pa. 13; Car-Mac’-!- &'ál lS5r De.vees is. Richard-ttlm "</p> <p>a made out, ciiancerywlll ^.kjCtata butcannotre-vise the o-Pim°n of the lawiudge. J °</p>
- 8 Ky. 481Young v. Lillard (1819)
<p>‘ ippeal from a decree Washington circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 483Tilford v. Emerson (1819)
<p>On an appeal from a do cree of the ¡Scott circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 485Slaughter v. M'Clain (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Nelson circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 486Carlisle v. Long (1819)
<p>-⅞ a menTa^ainft the pl’tff, to present may reply in avoidance of t!íe Plea>Aat right of aco-but to r^ifoatioti0*1 valid,it slio’d set forth the ⅛⅞,. became interested, On a nlea</p>
- 8 Ky. 488Moore v. Waller's Heirs (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Bourbon circuit court, </p>
- 8 Ky. 493Kercheval v. Triplett's Heirs (1819)
<p>4-made^beArfe the acts of 179Sibi-Unds ill d]C ÜCiV erss another', is vo:d.</p> <p>A warrany ty contained ln such deed, Use grantor,</p>
- 8 Ky. 496Shackelford v. Hendley's Ex'ors (1819)
<p>A «usre-ofab material fact (be it ther fraudu-cent,°if itpro-duces mis. Chifia t0 lhe ty) aiikePvi" tiates a contract; the oiu ° nrpoe tani as it may affect themo-of therein" not as ⅞¾ fects the con tract; Aide ■vs'Seemiss!</p> <p>the f t rnisrepresen-ted be such as probably enced - the contract,itis material,</p> <p>a t a ⅛ lai)*ls erma(jg before the é-manamn of ⅛.</p> <p>a discharge ^neentoy the influence °f1,13 ihe informed will must concur with tte »e%</p> <p>An obligee makfng^’he same misrepresentation ^adeJo-tflm »¡¡h regard to• the title, ⅛ ésact ' p;,v. ment fron)i the assignee, even tho’ the obligor endorse on til: bond that lie will perforin the condition in Favor of the assignee.</p> <p>If the obli-gor conveys to the assign-ee, knowing him to be insolvent, and that the assignor h;’S not been psid ’.is fraudulent.</p> <p>There bea “qu-dpru ?'»” in every exe':utory chancery wit) not decree it.</p> <p>a vendor misrepiesai-⅛¶ the state ih»liC '⅛⅛ soíi, wUl be res r.tmed »coo emorc-⅛'⅞ sale, ⅛ with general .warranty.</p> <p>Chancery will vacate a fraudulent contract., tuo* t e parties r.annoi be placed in statu quo, if that slate ofthmgs has been produced wrh-out the act of he injured party.</p>
- 8 Ky. 506Higginbotham v. Fishback (1818)
<p>i’h.e act of limitations cannotbesuc-cess fully reii-tidon, in bar of a pl’ntill s patent.i ndt 20 years old.</p> <p>'right of entry by 5 years possess¡on and a de therenuistWe ¿n acuialdis-an'e^Tavtor vs'steele’sh. 3¡5, acc. '</p> <p>^ An entry^in-dcracontraci to purchase of the paten-flf Jl R° dlS</p> <p>■Holding der such Wbie verse’ vide C;ay vs. Moj' nage to!</p> <p>Tbe occit-pant.purcha-⅛⅛”1 claim, not the does changa c.hM.icter ^o. sión.</p>
- 8 Ky. 507Cobb v. Thompson (1819)
<p>.An assignee üfajudsm’nt procured m ,-¡,a;nst a c¡. tizen 6f &⅛ siáte> m:iy oí-Li,e ass¡gn., or to enforce payment; but if the assign- or be dead, the assignee may apply to chancery in hisownriame, if \heie be no ex adm’r' or ex’or in this sure — the as-signee will not be compelled to ad. minister.</p> <p>The law ot iiirithigS'the time when paymentoi a ghaUbecom-¡relied' cañ-not be relied den^defendant, who, after service of Pr°cess>. a,ni mem, has removed from tr> L</p> <p>: A. debtor entitled to a set off, may assert that right against an assignee,]! it accrued before notice of tile assignment, even though the claim grows out of a distinct matter.</p> <p>The assign, or of an em ry is not bound to survey a,nd patent the land; thatduty devolves on the assign-ee, who may procuré the pa'cnt in h-s own name.</p> <p>a decree t aken by pub* ab^enTdePt1 ⅛ ‘ not evi* dence of the lruth of statements oi the bill in a. ny collateral contest.</p> <p>A patent Having1 issued on an assigned entry to the assignor, he holds the title in trust for the as-signee.</p> <p>ifbyafray. duteru or vo hintary act ""artswi'-Juhe title, he is an-swerabie to ^Jeslut</p> <p>But if the s de-favor 0f 0‘nc shewing no e(tmfy> the serthisclaim w> the proper-^’t bg„bj*^ ⅛⅜ trustee.</p> <p>lo^w u' n^t decree nve-rest, except ile-yeiT 11C r¡ t a pcnaUy.'or incuses where ^fl|j law £lves Su</p>
- 8 Ky. 514Davis v. Harrison (1819)
<p> cult court. On an appeal from a judgment of the JSelsmi dr- </p>
- 8 Ky. 517Lytle v. Rowton (1819)
<p>Slaves, the property oí the wife, are vested in tb-husband, and if he survives the wife, it is immaterial whether they were reduced to possession during the coverture or not, if they are realestate they vest without possession; if personal, be alone is representative of the wife, and therefore entitled to the possession.</p> <p>Slaves be-ommue,vest mJ!'® a" „r S!-¿ the mother,</p> <p>But if un-of division of •'iUth slaves ^^alioted ,.0 lie moilier, who holds' for a tinaos vear™ (⅛<= brothers undei^n0™6' abílítv^0 the act o'fiimita-nonswüipi-⅛.' ½</p> <p>stat. of limü tati',ns ⅛ noTembrae» Droceedinus" in chancery, its provision»</p>
- 8 Ky. 520Beauchamp v. Morris (1819)
<p> Oñ a tvrii of error to reverse á judgment of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 521Day v. Clarke's Administ'r (1819)
<p> On a writ of error to re verse a judgment of the Jefferson circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 523Lewis' Heirs v. Singleton's Heirs (1819)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 525Allin's Heirs v. Hall's Heirs (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Franklin circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 529Heytle v. Logan (1819)
Qn an appeai fi-om a deeree of the Fayette circmt cmrt‘ The counsel for the appellee presented a petition for rehearing, which suspended the decree for some time, hence the decision is not inserted in its proper place.
- 8 Ky. 532Murphy v. Riggs (1819)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Lincoln circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 535Mountjoy v. Oldham (1819)
<p>An inquest man on a mill ®eat’ fatal* J it state whether or not the neighbors willbeannoy-edvrV:ld post Taylor, acc.</p>
- 8 Ky. 535Stapp v. Anderson (1819)
<p>A consicer-a.tionis indis-p'ensible to maintain an assumpsit, but a b-.neflt toone,orirow-tie or injury to ⅛ other party, isasuf ficient consideration.</p> <p>Theeador-ser of a note makes an im-amount^ifUie (kawer-iscun- ,</p> <p>veJchear]!f1'(r mova!^from the state of *</p> <p>fP things "are delivered to one J>ersc>m £“⅛⅝°”r reqUest of ano-t!,er> l!ie aswhose credit the anides „0tcoJiaterat’. VideS l’. ftt g^rcrv ¾3* 3Wiis ¿30?; 3 Btirr.'18S§v</p> <p>A note negotiated in and'need^oi be protester, tosubjectthe üísifí’ior; biit at bank, but not negotia-notathelfc 1⅜ tile paper. ' ^</p> <p>-> kine^'tbe o-ltU of an'insolvent debt- or, amt remo-sute per sc, subjects the ®'ldi°r*er,s •. ¡JJiainst' ük* ojjiigor.</p>
- 8 Ky. 542Morehead v. Prather (1819)
<p>Alto’ the 4»⅛ ofa bond ⅛» ^nominal amount may not be usuri-the event of » recoil, is answerable^ mount of the consideration bond terest*11 and iast.</p>
- 8 Ky. 545M'Bean v. Morrison (1819)
<p>¿ , , ■ * # On an appeal jrom a judgmmt qf the Fayette circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 546Banks v. Oden (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the! Franklin circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 551Sibley v. Eastin (1819)
<p>Where'there the^jury6»*® to JttHge notCgr*n7a new trial, tte verdict being ble. '</p> <p>[This point has been so repeatedly decided in the same wav, that it is thought wholly superfluous to report any inore opinions, embracing that question alone. Scarce a Volume of reports can be opened, in which the reader will not find this point recognized.] — £&nt. Reg.</p>
- 8 Ky. 552Hunt v. Sanders (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 552Major v. Taylor (1819)
<p> On a writ of error to hversfr an order of the county court of FrarMin. </p>
- 8 Ky. 554Trustees of Louisville v. Gwathmey (1819)
<p> On a writ of error to' reverse ajudg't of the Jefferson circuit court </p>
- 8 Ky. 555Talbot v. Brockman (1819)
<p>A misrepre. sentation of the condition of property is a ío’í, and will not sustain assump-sit on the implied undertaking; Vid ante, pa 435, Carstarphen vs Graves,ac</p>
- 8 Ky. 555Hall v. Gentry (1819)
<p>) On a writ of error to reverse a > judgment of the Bullitt circuit7 V court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 557Clay v. Fox (1819)
<p>The law 11-miting the . for. for sion acts éf infringement of the com-* pactwitbVij¡^ Kendo’, Vs slaughter ■ acc,</p>
- 8 Ky. 558Morgan v. Ballard (1819)
<p>A 5?⅞«⅝\ ;fcmiTer ad-f-⅛⅞ v.'ivi'-h "u-a tCweijp!e:.de<ii '</p> <p>A con'ract⅛ w;th á tenant' ylyehy he 1 waiord and Mh>rn to ano-' ®?r" ^p!einducid in !»⅞-.</p>
- 8 Ky. 560Watts v. M'Kenny (1819)
<p> (hi a wit of error to' reverse a judgment of the Clarke dr-cuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 562Young v. Young (1819)
<p>A widow TeedThe provision made for be» ⅛ dower, will not be per-gftV(er when she executed t!,e deed ^ nor wil[ ¿ s'ranger be permitted to quest™ that</p>
- 8 Ky. 563Bell's Heirs v. Breckenridge's Heir's (1819)
<p> Writ of error. </p>
- 8 Ky. 566Commonwealth v. Littell (1819)
<p>A recoo-r» zance talen bv a circuit limiTbuTh! ¿isch.tmberíl Avoid.</p>
- 8 Ky. 567Allin v. Davis (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Nelson circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 568Tilford v. Creel (1819)
<p>On a bond gi-v n by a sheriff &c. under Hie act of ’97, (1 Litt. 678,) . county creditor becoming so after the dare of the bond,cannot maintain amotion in his own name vs, the sh’ff, &c. Such motion may be maintained under the act of ’92, (1 Lit 85)</p> <p>The order directing t e sheriff to pay the c’nty creditor, is no evidence that the sh’ffis indebted to the county.</p> <p>To charge that fact he the persons denominated securities, they must be proved to be so, if contested.</p>
- 8 Ky. 569White v. Robinson (1819)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Clarice circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 570Hunt & Blanton v. Stephenson (1819)
<p>The answer of o e def’nt c.-.nnot be used against ar; other.</p> <p>A draft de livered io the: drawee and retained for a considerable time, will be presumed'»; paid.</p>
- 8 Ky. 572Chalfant's adm'r v. Hart's adm'r (1819)
<p>be sustainecl pn a replevy bond, and the condition^in Lhe tion,isatmost but surplus-3ge</p> <p>^entsof ade-cedent’s estate are ,evi-adm’r, anda transcript missible.</p>
- 8 Ky. 573Owings v. Norton (1819)
<p>A purchaser of lands, the title whereof is not to be made ’til the happening of a cont'mgerty cy, is not entitled to tha rent3 growing, before the happening of the contingency.</p>
- 8 Ky. 576Cartmill v. Brown (1819)
<p> On an appeal from ajudgment of the Bullitt cir~ cuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 579Haggin v. Christian (1819)
<p>^ , , 0nfm appeal from* judgment of trie Puijcttc circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 582Chiles v. Calk (1819)
<p>an appeal fro~n a jiu~g1nent QJ the ~`lIontgomerj circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 582Trumbo v. Curtright (1819)
<p>n , , , , On an appeal from a judgment °f tild ®ourljon c!rcmf C0UrL</p>
- 8 Ky. 584Guthrie v. Wickliffe (1819)
<p>iaicrest, «tica allow’d m thediscre-¡ t;on ot ⅛ liG'y by wiyoid-i-iñages,should on the*whole demand, to dhe first payment, ^ gregate, and then ealeu-Irdanceupm .ihejadgra’nt.</p>
- 8 Ky. 585Carter v. Woolright (1819)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a a judgment of the Knox circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 587Baker v. Hopkins (1819)
<p>⅛ jate afterver-diet to object «’“‘has 'not beenregularty changed,</p> <p>Ina.namali1 cio-is prosecution, the character ot e e ei( ¿nt veracity his is not a pro-Pf unless m<.de so by the pleadings.</p>
- 8 Ky. 587Shortridge v. Catlett (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Green-up circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 588Brady v. Commonwealth (1819)
<p>Acasedis-delay cause, under tlm rule of the t8i7'.S el‘a'</p>
- 8 Ky. 589Neale v. Cogar (1819)
<p>Jin appeal from an order of the Jcs-samine county court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 589Neale v. Cogar (1819)
- 8 Ky. 590Mobley v. Hamit (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Christian circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 591Payne v. America Brittenham (1819)
<p>In act-I0ns on tort, the amount:ofda-with the jury.</p>
- 8 Ky. 592Ragland's Executors v. Allin (1819)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Clarke circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 592Bond v. Hendricks (1819)
<p>Orí a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Scott circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 595Meridith v. Nichols (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a de~ cree-of the Woodford circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 602Coleman v. Harper (1819)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Chris« lian circuit court.</p>
- 8 Ky. 603Bullit's Heirs v. Tharp (1819)
<p>An error m an to'ry deci-.e, tioned in'tln' final decree, furmstes ne versal — vide wu ¿22,tied-acc’i'S UUi’V’</p> <p>Vide Bibb, 490, the this opinion has relation.</p>
- 8 Ky. 604Marshall v. Sanderson (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a tie-crec of the Nicholas circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 605Scroggs v. Bodley (1819)
<p>To]ie ⅛⅛ 0f a s ream, when “re lla(1 C1ded "heJl* and where no one branch ^ "cquh led 'tha' ap-pellaiion, is gene.' ¡ocaúve call, Vide 1 Bibb, ⅛,⅛ ⅛2 Taylor vs. Keyterid; — . gR,s‘ S3 Speed vs. 'Vdson;— ⅛⅛⅞ ’&5⅛ vs. Bradford.</p>
- 8 Ky. 606Norvell v. Bodley (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a ¿e* cree of the Fleming cir-emit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 606Moseley v. Jamison (1819)
<p>An entry calling to adjoin a previous one, “on the S E corner,” is to be surveyed by runmigaline From the N E to the S W corne*, & extending the line from each corner, to form the "bpse of a square, thence at right angles from the base thus formed A constructive figure of ¿survey must yield to positive calls in the entry; alj of which must have an effect</p> <p>An entry calling to adjoin anot er on the S E corner (that other being a square with lines to t.; e cardinal points) thru N, then E, then S for quantity, is to he -*urve\ - edjoioingthe first entry of' tiie east side, sp.d from the NE that a line N w to the S w¡n include the quantity,</p>
- 8 Ky. 609Young v. Wilson (1819)
<p>An entry eallingforob-jects of the senses all round, and in-cludinjrfm'ity more land than the warrant justifies, ⅛ good for none — Vide ante, pa. 271, Marshall vs. Russel, and the cases there cited, and Coleman vr. Henderson, ante, pa. <112, acc.</p> <p>A subsequent entry lor a still smaller quantity of acres, fnade “to include the surplus” cannot be united with the first, but is also, raid»</p>
- 8 Ky. 610Ogden v. Sprigg (1819)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Shelbf circuit court. </p>
- 8 Ky. 612Ray v. M'Ilroy (1819)
<p>Infant fendants need not appear before the a(jiftem,</p> <p>An forfc 0f Sait river, a-, b°ut 6 mile's beginning' it a walnut tree °jl ule, about 50 po. below the ^ £ extendin'-6 to the said fork, °.n "⅞ fork and the creek An entrv ‘the Rolf-1 ⅛⅛ ⅞⅛ and lick being notorious, arid the tree & creek found to correspond with the description. A lick known by the name of “the Cedar lick,” but on another stream.could not embarrass a subsequent locator.</p> <p>This entry should be surveyed by running' up the Rolling fork,with the meanders,’til the distance, on a straight line, is obtained, and from the beginning out with the general course of that part of the large erek included in the survey, (botn irnes of equaliength) so far that a line at right angles to the reduced line on the tors, will include the quantity.</p>
- 8 Ky. 615Withers' Heirs v. Steele (1819)
<p>IfareIf0“Scts are place from claim’d, mn^withthe calls of an entry, as that ⅛ me absence of proof to ft*s the entry; would be voul .tor buMf'a'd'is-cordance is to ex-res*pects*°b^ tween * the calls of an sett»fob'»cts she ivn for the purpose of vacating' it, features™^ like, white there is a pn--try fetweai the calls the entry and sh“wn°m°ds support, the en-ry will</p> <p>nt callin^'to elude a sink-lno sPnnS & m'debyTB and extend-ingesstward-BV° íeu!^ ment,” must tie surveyed eívde the *n' spring and improvement of nndto'estenii towards the of A tiToTv settlement.11* Vme; the bass ime at n.c;ht Tcw'v⅛ A K’s ⅛. provement, Jhestn>a•■t'is’ tiicroto. ~</p>
- 8 Ky. 617Eastin v. Bell (1819)
- 8 Ky. 618Elliot's heirs v. Whaley (1819)
- 8 Ky. 620Owings v. Patterson's heirs (1819)