Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 Ky. 121

Current v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 11, 1817

Court of Appeals of Kentucky · decided 1817-12-11

<p>A person selling cider by tlle quart street, (ittte-ing the product of his own farm,) is not within the purview of the act restraining tip-ling houses-</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1895

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1817-12-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Judge Owsley

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2This is an appeal, brought to recover a judgment rendered against the appellant, upon a presentment for retail-ingcider by the quart, in the town of Paris.

¶3This court is of opinion, that according to the proviso *122contained in the sixth section of the act of 1793,a regií-lating taverns and restraining tipling houses, that no fine should be imposed upon any persons for selling liquors, at any place whatever, made from the production of their own farms, unless sold to be drunk in their house; and as the cider sold by the appellant, was admitted to have been made from the production of bis farm, judgment ought not to have been rendered against him. The judgment must, therefore, be reversed.

Talbot for appellant; Blair, attorney general, contra.

¶41 Litt. 19 7

/8/ky/121 · .json · Public domain