Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 Md. App. 395

Franklin v. Warden

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 9, 1970

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · decided 1970-01-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1971

1 state decisions

Relies on 1 Md. App. 23 - Taylor v. Director, Patuxent Institution · Yopps v. Warden

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1970-01-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Morton, J.,

¶1delivered the opinion of the Court.

¶2This is an application for leave to appeal from a denial of Post Conviction relief by Judge William W. Travers sitting in the Circuit Court for Dorchester County.

¶3Sometime prior to the filing of this petition, the applicant had apparently sought relief by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corptis at which time counsel was appointed and a hearing thereon was held by Judge Daniel T. Prettyman who denied the petition. The present petition, however, appears to be his first petition under the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act. We have consistently held that Md. Rules BK42 and BK44 affirmatively require a hearing upon every first petition filed under the Act and further require that counsel be appointed where it appears that the petitioner is indigent. Yopps v. Warden, 1 Md. App. 537; Taylor v. Director, 1 Md. App. 23. It appears from the record before us that no hearing was held on the applicant’s petition nor was he represented by counsel. Accordingly, the case will be remanded to afford the applicant a hearing and, in the event he is determined, to be an indigent, counsel should be appointed to represent him.

¶4Application for leave to appeal granted and case remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

/8/mdapp/395 · .json · Public domain