Fairclough v. Baumgartner

ELMER FAIRCLOUGH AND MARTHA FAIRCLOUGH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HERMAN BAUMGARTNER AND THERESA BAUMGARTNER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Argued November 12, 1951.

Decided November 19, 1951.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1957

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1951-11-19

¶1 *190Mr. J. Mortimer Rubenstein argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Milton Schamach, attorney).

¶2Mr. I. Arthur Weiss argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Weiss & Weiss, attorneys).

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Grimshaw.

¶5For affirmance Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON 6.

¶6For reversal None.