Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 N.J. Misc. 266

Jacobs v. Ehehalt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 9, 1930

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1930-04-09

Decided 1930-04-09

Per Curiam.

¶1Plaintiff recovered a verdict for $5,000 and the defendant has a rule for new trial, contending that the damages are excessive.

¶2Plaintiff had a broken fibula of the left leg; had it in a cast for six weeks; stiffness followed and there is some impairment of motion. He is a farmer seventy years old, does much of his own work and may have trouble in performing the heavier duties incident thereto. He had a medical bill of $249.

¶3We think, however, that the verdict is excessive. If the plaintiff will accept the sum of $3,500 the rule will be discharged; otherwise it will be made absolute.

/8/njmisc/266 · .json · Public domain