Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

8 Serg. & Rawle 423

Brisbane v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1822

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1822-06-24

In Error. ERROR on a bill of exceptions to the rejection of evidence by the Court of Common Pleas of Mijflin county. The plaintiff below, Thomas Mitchell, brought this action against William Brisbane, on a promissory note for fifty dollars.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1836

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1822-06-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam. —

¶1It is enacted by the Act of the 20th of March, 1810, see. 11, that “the appellant shall not be permitted to produce as evidence in Court, any books, papers, or documents which he shall have withheld from the arbitrators.” To bring the case within the Act, the paper must *425;bave been in the power of the appellant when called for before the arbitrators, and voluntarily withheld by him. The evidence which was offered to the Court on this subject is placed on the record, and it appears to us that the indenture was not voluntarily withheld by the defendant. On the contrary, it had been mislaid, and was searched for by the defendant after he had been called upon to produce it; but it could not be found until after the award was made. It is the opinion of the Court, therefore, that it ought to have been admitted in evidence, and that the judgment should be reversed and a venire facias de novo awarded.

¶2Judgment reversed, and a venire facias de novo awarded.

/8/sergrawle/423 · .json · Public domain