In Re Everett’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1979
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Holladay v. State · In re Sweeney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * we want it known that we disapprove of long delays such as occurred here, in bringing to a conclusion charges against a member of the bar for professional misconduct. It is most unfair to the accused as well as bringing our disciplinary procedure into disrepute.” In Re Everett, 80 Ariz. 124, 128 , 293 P.2d 928, 931 (1956). See also In Re Moeur, 82 Ariz. 185 , 310 P.2d 508 (1957).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter of Carroll
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.