Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

80 Me. 243

Ames v. Storer

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 7, 1888

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · decided 1888-03-07

<p>Partial payment after discharge in insolvency. B. 8., c. Ill, § 1, p. VI.</p> <p>The voluntary partial payment of a judgment, after the same has become barred by the debtor’s discharge in insolvency, does not revive and make valid the balance of such judgment.</p>

Decided 1888-03-07

Peters, C. J.

¶1These facts present the question, whether the-voluntary partial payment of a judgment, after the judgment has-become barred by the debtor’s discharge in insolvency, has the-effect to revive the balance of the judgment so that the debtor is. bound by it anew.

¶2The statute (R. S., c. Ill, § 1, p. 6,) forbids that any new promise shall have such an effect, unless it be in writing, and! signed by the party to be charged thereby. Certainly, the payment of a part of a debt is not a written promise .to pay the-balance. It might be regarded as some evidence of á promise to pay the debt, but the element of certainty, as required to bé shown by written evidence, is utterly wanting.

¶3 Plaintiff nonsuit.

Walton, Danforth, Libbey, Emery and Haskell, JJ., concurred.
/80/me/243 · .json · Public domain