80 Wash. App. 374 - State v. Cameron’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2016
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 851 (§ 411 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Rideout v. United States · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wisconsin · United States v. Dayton · West v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Class B prior felony convictions shall be included in the offender score unless the offender has spent 10 years conviction-free since the last date of release from confinement.); RCW 9A.36.011 (first degree assault is a class A felony); RCW 9A.36.021 (second degree assault is a class B felony). [10] The”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Berry“The first step ... is to identify any comparable Washington offenses by comparing the elements of the out-of-state crime with the elements of the potentially comparable Washington crimes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Russell“[o]ut-of-state convictions for offenses shall be classified according to the comparable offense definitions and sentences provided by Washington law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Winings
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.