Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 CONNAPP 503 - State v. Ankerman

State v. Ankerman’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2022

19 state decisions

150200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Golding · State v. Stepney · Strobel v. Strobel · State v. Morrill · State v. Ceballos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence is admissible only if it is relevant.... Relevant evidence is evidence that has a logical tendency to aid the trier in the determination of an issue.... One fact is relevant to another if in the common course of events the existence of one, alone or with other facts, renders the existence of the other either more certain or more probable.... It is well settled that questions of relevance are committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.