Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

81 F.3d 153

Docket No. 94-2437.

Williams v. Commonwealth D L J

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Jan. 29, 1996. Decided March 28, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Relies on Yiaadey v. Burgess

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2012

2 district ·

20199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

ARGUED: Harris Dewey Butler, III, BUTLER, MACON, WILLIAMS, PANTELE & LOWNDES, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. William Gatling Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Nancy Lang Lowndes, BUTLER, MACON, WILLIAMS, PANTELE & LOWNDES, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General of Virginia, Catherine C. Hammond, Deputy Attorney General, Neil A.G. McPhie, Senior Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Martha Williams appeals (1) the order dated September 15, 1994, granting partial summary judgment to the Commonwealth of Virginia, and (2) the order dated October 18, 1994,* granting judgment as a matter of law in the Commonwealth's favor. Our review of the record and the arguments of counsel disclose that the appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Comm. of Virginia, Dep't of Social Services, No. 3:93CV688 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 1994 & Aug. 21, 1995) (memorandum opinions).

¶2

AFFIRMED.

*

The district court initially entered an order granting judgment as a matter of law on October 18, 1994, and noted therein that a written opinion would follow. When the memorandum opinion was issued on August 21, 1995, the court entered a "Final Order" again granting judgment as a matter of law and dismissing the case

/81/f3d/153 · .json · Public domain