Gee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Houser v. State · Lampkins v. State · 175 Ind. App. 503 - Martin v. State · Lampkins v. State · Davenport v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) incriminating statements made by the defendant, (2) attempted flight or furtive gestures, (3) location of substances like drugs in settings that suggest manufacturing, (4) proximity of the contraband to the defendant, (5) location of the contraband within the defendant’s plain view, and (6) the mingling of the contraband with other items owned by the defendant.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A defendant is in the constructive possession of drugs when the State shows that the defendant has both (1) the intent to maintain dominion and control over the drugs and (i) the capability to maintain dominion and control over the drugs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilkerson v. State“the inference of intent to maintain dominion and control over the drugs 'must be supported by additional cirenmstances pointing to the defendant's knowledge of the nature of the controlled substances and their presence?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilkerson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.