Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

811 So. 2d 748

L.I.B. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 27, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-02-27

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2018

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“[t]he granting of a new trial is a proper remedy when an adequate record cannot be prepared”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Barber v. State

Relies on 350 So. 2d 462 - Delap v. State · MRG v. State · Willis v. Boggess

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-02-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SILBERMAN, Judge.

¶1L.I.B. seeks review of the circuit court order adjudicating him delinquent. It is undisputed that, through no fault of L.I.B., a transcript of the adjudicatory hearing is unavailable and an adequate record cannot be constructed. The granting of a new trial is a proper remedy when an adequate record cannot be prepared. Delap v. State, 350 So.2d 462, 463 (Fla.1977). This principle has been applied to juvenile cases. M.R.G. v. State, 576 So.2d 1378, 1378 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); S.D. v. State, 677 So.2d 861, 861 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Therefore, we reverse and remand to the circuit court to conduct a de novo adjudicatory hearing.

DAVIS, J., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.
/811/so2d/748 · .json · Public domain