Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 814 F.2d 1321 - Shabazz v. Carroll

Shabazz v. Carroll’s Empirical Analysis

814 F.2d 1321 · 1987

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
December 2003
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2003 · most notably United States v. Martinez (1988), Jarvis v. Regan (1987)

20 federal appellate · 2 district ·

220198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Missouri v. Hunter · Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky · Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. · United States v. S.A. Empresa de Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense · Brown v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen there is no indication whether probation follows incarceration or incarceration is a condition of probation, [this court] assume[s] the latter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.